Re: [Scratchbox-users] New user asks for guidance

2008-09-22 Thread Jussi Hakala
Thomas Petazzoni wrote: As far as I've understood, and my experiments tend to confirm this, the toolchain must have been generated in a /scratchbox/compilers/foo directory in order to be integrated into Scratchbox. Moreover, the toolchain must be compiled against the Scratchbox environment,

Re: [Scratchbox-users] Integrated toolchain doesn't look in /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib

2008-09-22 Thread Jussi Hakala
Thomas Petazzoni wrote: I tried to integrate an ARM and MIPS toolchain, generated by Buildroot, into Scratchbox using sb-toolchain-extras. These toolchains have been successfully integrated, and they are able to generate binaries that can be transparently executed by Scratchbox. However, at the

Re: [Scratchbox-users] Python version in SB.

2008-09-22 Thread Daniel Bainton
2008/9/22 Jussi Hakala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mateusz Jan Dominikowski wrote: SB comes with Python version 2.3.4 so I compiled 2.5.2 from sources and installed it with standard prefix (/usr/local). As /usr/local/bin is redirected in SB I tried to export

Re: [Scratchbox-users] Python version in SB.

2008-09-22 Thread Jussi Hakala
Daniel Bainton wrote: That, or you can do as Kalle suggested and compile a newer version of python for the host architecture and put it inside /host_usr/. After that you won't need any environment variables since stuff in /host_usr/ always override the stuff in devkits and the core. That is,

Re: [Scratchbox-users] Python version in SB.

2008-09-22 Thread Daniel Bainton
2008/9/22 Jussi Hakala [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Daniel Bainton wrote: That, or you can do as Kalle suggested and compile a newer version of python for the host architecture and put it inside /host_usr/. After that you won't need any environment variables since stuff in /host_usr/ always override