Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:23:13AM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:57 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Is there any existing arm debian Etch scratchbox devkit that we can just
download?
Can I be the only person trying to do this?
Is that a fair assesment, or am I missing something obvious on how SB2
is meant to work?
Thanks,
-Jim Heck
This is exactly something that scratchbox2 [1] should make possible.
Or actually better, you don't need to _avoid_ host tools in order
to select your preferred host tools versions. You
c versions of tools from
the devkit.
I've read a bit about Scratchbox 2, and it sounds somewhat more like
what I'm trying to do here, but I haven't found enough to really
understand if it is ready to be fully used, and if so, what the ins and
outs are vs the older S
Riku Voipio wrote:
**5.1. From Scratchbox 1.0.7 on, flex is not regarded as a provided
package when checking debian build deps. This is fixed with the
following, performed inside scratchbox.
The issue here is that flex provides libfl.a, which is arch-specific.
Therefor some packages f
s. I was working on two different toolchains (ppc603
and ppc860), so I refer to both interchangably. There may be some
omissions or errors, it's a work in progress. There are two patches
that were needed to build the crocodile packages for powerpc, one for
procps and one for zlib.
-Jim
s,
or in case anybody had any ideas why gcc build under the host sandbox is
missing the /usr/lib default paths?
-Jim Heck
___
Scratchbox-users mailing list
Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org
http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
pped to the versions
specified in the first place.
Thanks for all your help,
-Jim Heck
i686-linux-gcc assert.c -c -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Winline
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-DFATAL_PREPARE_INCLUDE='' -I../include -I.
-I/home/jheck/sb-toolchains
a crosstool question, but does anyone know how to
configure crosstool to build a gcc3.4 compiler that is independent of
the host environment (e.g. no dependency on the libc for the host on
which the compiler was built)?
Thanks in advance for any help people can provide,
-Jim Heck
fresh.
I tried in Etch and had no problem upgrading my pre-r3 version of
Scratchbox (the system was up to date according my local Etch mirror).
Regards,
Jussi
Jim Heck wrote:
I'm trying to install scratchbox 1.0.6 on a completely up to date Debian
Etch system (updated fully as of 1
this.
Thanks,
-Jim Heck
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
waitpid(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], WNOHANG) = 10796
waitpid(-1, 0xaff5264c, WNOHANG)= -1 ECHILD (No child processes)
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [WINCH])
read(4, ""
10 matches
Mail list logo
