Indeed. It would seem that the problem of selecting compat vdso support
from the proc filesystem affects mostly 64 bit stock kernels.
Regards,
Jussi
Graham Cobb wrote:
By the way, if you are running a 64-bit kernel then
the /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled file will not exist and the only option
Ian Burrell wrote:
No. Fedora 9 is using 2.6.25 (latest is 2.6.25.10-86.fc9). As I
said, the kernel is compiled without CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. It looks
like this causes the /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled file to not exist. My
impression is that the kernel config is a result of using
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 14:42:08 Jussi Hakala wrote:
Ian Burrell wrote:
No. Fedora 9 is using 2.6.25 (latest is 2.6.25.10-86.fc9). As I
said, the kernel is compiled without CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. It looks
like this causes the /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled file to not exist. My
impression
Ian Burrell wrote:
I am unable to get scratchbox (for Maemo 4.1 SDK) working on Fedora 9.
I saw lots of places talking about disabling VDSO. The problem is
that Fedora 9 does not have /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled file. It looks
like the kernel is configured without compat VDSO support.
Indeed.
Ian Burrell wrote:
I am unable to get scratchbox (for Maemo 4.1 SDK) working on Fedora 9.
I saw lots of places talking about disabling VDSO. The problem is
that Fedora 9 does not have /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled file.
Does your system have the file /proc/sys/kernel/vdso ?
Older kernel has
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Janne Kataja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Burrell wrote:
I am unable to get scratchbox (for Maemo 4.1 SDK) working on Fedora 9.
I saw lots of places talking about disabling VDSO. The problem is
that Fedora 9 does not have /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled file.
Does
