Re: [Scratchbox-users] illegal instruction with binary compiled in scratchbox

2011-09-02 Thread Jussi Hakala
On 09/01/2011 07:11 PM, tgrs tfyguhi wrote: After a little more investigation, it appears that it appends only with the target arm-linux-cs2010q1-202. I deleted and recreated the target, just to be sure, but that was not the problem. Can you give me the output of sb-conf show on that target?

Re: [Scratchbox-users] illegal instruction with binary compiled in scratchbox

2011-09-02 Thread tgrs tfyguhi
-users@lists.scratchbox.org Subject: Re: [Scratchbox-users] illegal instruction with binary compiled in scratchbox Can you give me the output of sb-conf show on that target? For your info, even with arm-linux-cs2009q3-67, the binaries are not strictly identical in size: 20 bytes

Re: [Scratchbox-users] illegal instruction with binary compiled in scratchbox

2011-09-01 Thread Jussi Hakala
On 08/31/2011 07:03 PM, tgrs tfyguhi wrote: But the binary is NOT the same if I use 'gcc' provided by the target, or if I directly use /scratchbox/compilers/arm-linux-cs2010q1-202/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc. (If I understand properly how Scratchbox works, it's supposed to be the same gcc)

Re: [Scratchbox-users] illegal instruction with binary compiled in scratchbox

2011-09-01 Thread tgrs tfyguhi
Subject: Re: [Scratchbox-users] illegal instruction with binary compiled in scratchbox On 08/31/2011 07:03 PM, tgrs tfyguhi wrote: But the binary is NOT the same if I use 'gcc' provided by the target, or if I directly use /scratchbox/compilers/arm-linux-cs2010q1-202/bin/arm-none-linux