The following links were distributed at Defcon 11, and I'm familiar with
most of them. I think these should be included in the FAQ. The links
were distributed in association with InfoSec News of attrition.org,
which which I have no affiliation.
http://www.c4i.org/
http://www.nmrc.org/
I would suspect a compromzied host; recommend a portscan.
Justin
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:55:19PM +, chris wrote:
---
Not sure if this is understood or not. If someone wanted to hijack that
ipi address, they would have to control a computer on the same network
as that ip address. Otherwise packets they wanted to receive (to the
hijacked address) would go to the wrong network. With TCP, that means
they cannot
That should definitely be possible, though I don't know how it will
decide which NIC to use for what. What do you mean 192.168.0.6/24? A
NIC has an address, and that notation represents 2**8 - 1 addresses.
Justin
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:04:04AM +, Vineet Mehta wrote:
Hi all,
My
a netmask
appropriate for a /e network.
Justin
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:25:03PM +, chris halverson wrote:
I am not sure what you are asking when you refer to the 2**8 - 1 addresses.
Can you clarify?
From: Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vineet Mehta [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
Make sure you don't have voice-recognition turned on. I had one client
who though she was the victim of a virus/hack; needless to say, we were
puzzled. Fortunately, voice recognition occured to *one* technician...
Justin
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 07:10:02PM +, Enquiries wrote:
Dear
It shouldn't. The TCP sequence number *should* be cryptographically
strong. (As opposed to the IP ID number which is usually incremental).
It is strong in the sense that, even if I make 100 connections to a
host, and watch which sequence numbers it uses (and even of those are
100 consecutive
SIOCADDRT: File exists is a message from the kernel.
Justin
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:17:08PM +, Pessoft wrote:
1) Exist any way how to disable, or change sendmail banner to not show sendmail's
version.
2) When i'm starting network using service network start for example, it writes
First off you should make sure its not internally-generated traffic.
Then you should make sure your router and your ISP's router are not
passing those packets. RFC X (requirements for ip routers or
something) requires that, I think.
Justin
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:33:02PM +, Damon
Linux has scanlogd and scandetd, both of which are short and simple.
Probably Sun has their own, too. I don't know if anyone supports this,
but this could also be implemented on a router/switch, which would save
you time managing different OS.
Justin
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:26:02PM +,
Sure, you could set up the hardware firewall to do general pupose
filtering (don't pass mallicious icmp, block the virus-of-the-day port,
etc) and then set the individual hosts' firewalls to do things like
allow only establisted connections and connections to tcp:80, plus
connections to tcp:22
In the heirarch of network devices, a repeater is the stupidest. A hub
is a multiport repeater. What goes in one port goes out off of the
others. A *switch* otoh, actually looks at its input. At, methinks,
OSI-2, there is a hardware address. A switch looks at that address. It
keeps a list of
If you are connecting to the firewall host through an unknown/insecure
network, then the owners of that network will be able to see your
password.
If you are connecting to the firewall host through a local network, and
are connected through a hub (rather than a switch), than local users
(with
am not looking for a
philosophical
answer. I was looking statistics for marketing. Does anyone know of a
good
reference site for firewall and other security statistics.
SKP
-Original Message-
From: Justin Pryzby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:18 PM
From what I've heard a video camera is your best bet. Not a webcam,
just a VHS from walmart. Put it on super long play.
Maybe you could look into windows 3.0 recorder feature.
Justin
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:41:17AM +, Chris Burton wrote:
I am looking for a tool that I can load on a
Security,
100% of firewalls are misconfigured. I guarantee that no firewall
administrator has considered all of the posibilities that are out there.
Moreover, there are guaranteed bugs in the firewalling software itself.
No firewalls are misconfigured. Computers do what they are told, and
the
16 matches
Mail list logo
