On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:36:03AM -0600, Devon Ryan wrote:
R. Toma wrote:
open. Now, are these the famous trojans? I have linux, aren't they
programmed for a MS platform? How can I close these ports
Something tells me that you're running tripwire...or you scanned the
wrong ip :P
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:40:03PM -0800, Rich Richenberg wrote:
Hello All,
I'd appreciate your comments on the exposure Unix-based systems face
relative to malicious code being passed via email, http, etc. I notice that
the major antivirus vendors do not offer server or desktop products for
From: M. Wolffensperger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: sendmail.mc /etc/sendmail.cf
I have a problem with rebuilding the sendmail.mc file to the
sendmail.cf file I do the following [root@mail m.wolffensperger]# m4
At 08:46 PM 11/08/2001 -0500, Mark Medici wrote:
From what I've found so far, it seems that the AOL client program, when
installed, also installs something called the AOL Network Adapter. I've
seen this on some client machines, and always wondered what it was
doing. Now I realize that it is
- Original Message -
From: Hudak, Tyler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:56 AM
Subject: CERT paper and AOL VPN?
I tried to verify this over the weekend with no success. To do this, I
loaded ZoneAlarm on my test machine (running Windows 98)
Thus, in the perfect/hypothetical world where everyone followed RFC1918's
suggestions as well as it's requirements
Of course, being pedantic I feel the need to correct my own mistake here.
The 'requirement' of not using private IP space for public interfaces is
actually that of IANA, who
- Original Message -
From: Cliff Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; scott [gts] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
security-basics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:57 PM
Subject: RE: help - can someone explain this to me?
Those are spoofed addresses. They could be coming
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 08:29:21AM -0800, Andrew Blevins wrote:
[ Quoting reorganized to stop this insane top-posting!]
but that does not explain why he is gettings hits by non routable ip
addresses..even if they were natted they would show the NAT external address
..not the internal address
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 06:42:44PM -0500, KaTT KaTT wrote:
Simple high level explanation:
10.0.0.0/8 (255.255.255.0) is a class A addressing space
172.16.0.0/12 (255.240.0.0) is a class B addressing space
192.168.0.0/16 (255.255.255.0) is a class C addressing space
All of the above are
From: Michael Kjorling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:06 AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I belive not. The firewall code (the rules of which are managed
through ipfwadm/ipchains/iptables depending on your kernel version) is
executing directly in
10 matches
Mail list logo
