Perhaps as well, they do wish to monitor as much high encryption traffic
as they are able to detect, and wish to keep the signal to noise ratio
down as long as they can, until they are using 2048 or better
themselves... So, in the spirit of "good citizenry", we opt NOT to use
the strongest, so tha
Well said Paul, and, I would like to point out that at the time MS became interested
in Internet technologies, Macintosh servers accounted for 34% of all webservers, with
the lions share going to various *nix platforms. That that has changed in favor of
Windows solutions does not really mean th
You don't know what you're missing!
;>)
-Original Message-
From: Bejon Parsinia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:11 PM
To: William Holmberg; 'Eric Zatko'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Nessus follow up question.
Bill,
The only pr
I disagree on one small point: If you try out VPC5 you will see dramatic improvements;
even more enhanced if you are using a G4 processor (the VPC5 takes advantage of the
Altivec engine).
My .02,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Bejon Parsinia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, M
http://www.techrepublic.com
A great resource!
-Original Message-
From: Stanford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Security Manual - Due Diligence
Hello All -
I really need to create an "Operations Manual" type
security
Newbie question, but help me if you can...
:>D
I have recently set up a vanilla W2kPro box with the latest updates and patches (SP@
+sec rollup + critical updates)
I installed the Starband.net software (which uses a proxy itself to accellerate the
downloads and deal with the 4ms delays inherent
It is possibly the Zoher worm. See here:
http://www.intelligentx.com/newsletters/technology/articles/story_tech1_
122701.html
-Original Message-
From: Cory Flynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bill
Walls
Subj
I am seeing this as well. I thought we were in good shape, ran this tool
and... EEEP!!! 660 infected boxes~! All showing up on my report that assures
me they are patched! Any way to tweak this so it reports a bit more
faithfully?
-Original Message-
From: John Stauffacher [mailto:[EMAIL PR
