RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-26 Thread Chris Berry
izing that ssl is a tunneling protocol, while ssh is remote login one) >From: "Shawn Nunley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Chris Berry'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH >Date: Wed,

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-26 Thread Peter 'Luna' Runestig
From: "Chris Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [snip] > SSL-Secure Sockets Layer: Basically an add on bandaid type approach to make > inheirently insecure connections like telnet and ftp more secure by > encrypting transmissions at the SOCKET level. This system does not have > nearly the same robustnes

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-26 Thread Brad Arlt
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:54:17AM +0200, voguemaster wrote: > The only hint I have about the diff between SSH and SSL is the message > I replied to. When I was talking about elaborating on tunneling I was > basically asking what can I do with tunneling. Neither the SSL or the SSH > websites give

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-26 Thread voguemaster
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Brad Arlt >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Daniel Miessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH >>Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:54:17 +0200 >> >>Pardon me, but when have ppl given me that informatio

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread voguemaster
Ok, first and foremost, thank you for your reply :) I just wanted to make some comments: > >SSH first and foremost is a terminal program. I believe your first >post was something to the effect of "Telnet over SSL, or SSH, help me >decide". I was NOT the original poster to the list. I wanted

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread Chris Berry
gt;CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH >Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:54:17 +0200 > >Pardon me, but when have ppl given me that information ?? > >The only hint I have about the diff between SSH and SSL is the message >I replied to. When I was talking about elabora

Re: RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread voguemaster
You're right of course, and no need to apologize at all. In my post I didn't mean to ask people to show me the gory details of how to use SSH or SSL. I believe the original poster asked about differences in SSH vs. SSL when used as a remote login solution. What I was just asking is different in so

RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-25 Thread Vachon, Scott
>Just one example: can I code a client/server applications and encrypt and >do authentication with SSL/SSH tunneling ? I've no idea, not from the >things I've read about those two. Yeah, SSH is a secure login and shell >for a remote system. That I know. It's more than that, isn't it ?? >I'm sorry

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-24 Thread voguemaster
Pardon me, but when have ppl given me that information ?? The only hint I have about the diff between SSH and SSL is the message I replied to. When I was talking about elaborating on tunneling I was basically asking what can I do with tunneling. Neither the SSL or the SSH websites give any real h

Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-24 Thread netsec novice
ter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], netsec novice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brad Arlt ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Miessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH >Date: Tue, 24 Sep 20

RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH

2002-09-24 Thread Daniel Miessler
> Please check the thread sir. I asked the original question and was nicely surprised > at the friendly and informative responses. Thanks to everyone who replied. The > second request for information came as a response to my original post from a > second party. Well, then I stand corrected. I