Alright - the new 'category' format is now checked in to SMW, and it seems
to work fine. There's also a somewhat related change that was made: the
SMWSQLStore2Query class now retrieves the 'smw_sortkey' field from the
database, and uses that when creating the object for each page to be
displayed -
When doing an edit on our metavid.org site the following query takes up
to 70 seconds:
INSERT /* SMW::makeSMWPageID */ INTO `smw_ids` ( smw_id, smw_title,
smw_namespace,
after it runs it only takes a fraction of a second to insert the next
edit you do.
Has anyone else run into this issue and ha
Even though personally I would prefer it to be in SRF, I see your point,
and also see that it is not much code. Putting it in SMW core makes
sense in my opinion.
denny
Yaron Koren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dave Loomer wrote a 'category' result format, which puts page names in
> columns, sorted and under
Hi,
Dave Loomer wrote a 'category' result format, which puts page names in
columns, sorted and under their first letter heading, just like MediaWiki's
category pages; I'd like to check this in to SMW itself, and not SRF, since
I think it should be an integral part of SMW. This was discussed earlie
Well, the real problem, reading through the deletion discussion, seems to be
just that the template adds too much to the page ("This template adds 163.2
KiB to each of the 1,909 articles to which it is attached, and that is a big
problem for anyone who is not using a broadband connection"), as oppo
Guys, you have a chance to help Brion explain why SMW can help get rid of
Large nested templates.
Sergey
-- Forwarded message --
From: Domas Mituzas
Date: Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Large nested templates (example:
NYRepresentatives)
To: Wikim
