Hi Yaron!
I'm in favor in semantifying everything but here I'd agree with you - I
don't yet see the usecase where it would be useful to have semantified
inline comments. Or any comments and discussions, for that matter.
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yaron Koren
Hey,
Composer is just a dependency manager. It has nothing to do with
configuration. So how config is done in MediaWiki remains unchanged :)
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3
--
hmm. short answer:
As WikiMediaLabs is doing this: http://annotator.wmflabs.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum
it is probably going to be available in MW installations. Therfore it makes
sense to have some semantification of it (and yes, general semantification is
an interesting topic, the special semantic
Hey,
I had assumed that, but I was getting errors with undefined namespaces
(SMW_NS constants) that I was referencing after the (removed) require_once
statements.
Some changes in SMW where made recently that limit usage of the namespace
constants in a way that was not present before. This is an
Hi,
Some changes in SMW where made recently that limit usage of the namespace
constants in a way that was not present before. This is an exceptional case
and should definitely be documented. It might already be, I'm not sure.
Actually, the use of the Composer introduced a necessary adoption
Hi,
Bernhard - you've made a good case for having annotator functionality
within MediaWiki. What you haven't really made a good case for is being
able to query that annotation info using SMW, which is the relevant thing
here.
David - if you want to talk about the general stuff, you should
Thanks Yaron, I'll give those a try.
In my case, it manifested when I added one more instance. The form opened
up and let me add content just fine, but on save it essentially re-rendered
the form (still in edit mode) with my addition removed.
From: Yaron Koren [mailto:ya...@wikiworks.com]
Hi Sal,
A few variations on this question have come up on the mailing lists
recently. SF itself doesn't impose any limits - but PHP and/or Javascript
have their own natural limits, PHP by limiting the number of fields whose
value can be passed when the form is submitted, and Javascript by slowing
What's the limit on the number of template instances that can be displayed
in a form that uses multiple?
Thanks.
Sal
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't
