RE: Configuration samples and organization (was [PATCH] Fetchmail for v2.2)

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Brewin
> > > > I do not have full CVS access > > > Why not? > > > 'cos :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/public doesn't > contain/show the > > alpha code. > > Try checking out branch_2_1_fcs instead of the main trunk. :-) Turns out the CVS Perspective in the version of Eclipse I'm using doesn't automatic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22893] New: - Add support for APOP authentication protocol

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Microsoft Outlook (.MSG) format conversion

2003-09-02 Thread Serge Knystautas
Serge Knystautas wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: In case anyone is interested, http://www.xs4all.nl/~mvz/software/msgconv.org.html provides conversion from .MSG -> mbox. Perhaps someone wants to write a respository type that can handle a directory of such files. Link is dead (for me). Also, isn

Re: Microsoft Outlook (.MSG) format conversion

2003-09-02 Thread Serge Knystautas
Noel J. Bergman wrote: In case anyone is interested, http://www.xs4all.nl/~mvz/software/msgconv.org.html provides conversion from .MSG -> mbox. Perhaps someone wants to write a respository type that can handle a directory of such files. Link is dead (for me). Also, isn't .msg just a single email

Re: More info from bounces

2003-09-02 Thread Serge Knystautas
Andreas Goggerle wrote: My first approach was to implement it into the existing bounce methods. But having a mailet responsible for creating DSNs also seems to be a good idea. Personally I would prefer this new bounce-architecture. So what does the community say? Which way should I go? I can see th

RE: More info from bounces

2003-09-02 Thread Andreas Goggerle
Hi Noel, > There are two sides of bounce management. James generating > notices, e.g. > RFC 3464 DSNs; and James understanding bounces, e.g. ,DSN, > VERP, etc. What > aspect(s) have you implemented? We extended James with a service called fetchdb that reads a mailjob-database and produces mails

RE: Code review of "FromRepository" Re-spooling mailet

2003-09-02 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Noel, the attachment did not get through. Can you resend it please? Thanks, Vincenzo > -Original Message- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: martedì 26 agosto 2003 5.41 > To: James-Dev Mailing List > Subject: Code review of "FromRepository" Re-spooling mailet > >

Re: Useful error messages

2003-09-02 Thread Stephen McConnell
Noel J. Bergman wrote: So I did some digging . .. and in the James source for RepositoryManager I noticed the following: We inherited that code from Cornerstone when we were told that in order to fix bugs in the Cornerstone code, we needed to take that into our module so that PeterD cou

RE: Configuration samples and organization (was [PATCH] Fetchmail for v2.2)

2003-09-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> > > I do not have full CVS access > > Why not? > 'cos :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/public doesn't contain/show the > alpha code. Try checking out branch_2_1_fcs instead of the main trunk. :-) --- Noel - To unsubsc

Re: Useful error messages

2003-09-02 Thread Stephen McConnell
Noel J. Bergman wrote: As I understand it from your previous notes, Merlin is primarily short in the area of log configuration? It's the reverse - well almost. The reverse would suggest that Merlin is long in the area of short configurations which doesn't really man anything to me. Huh? Steph

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16834] - smtpserver.log doesn't show Message-ID

2003-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Configuration samples and organization (was [PATCH] Fetchmail for v2.2)

2003-09-02 Thread Steve Brewin
> I am also thinking of factoring out other portions of the > file, so that the > file is less visually complex. And easier to maintain through releases. The main config. file for each release should indicate which included files need to be reviewed due to changes. Most includes can simply be copi