Am Samstag, den 27.05.2006, 23:53 +0200 schrieb Joachim Draeger:
> At first I have to clarify there are issues with javamaildir-0.6.2. It
> has problems in storing many mails per (milli)second. I am working on a
> release of javamaildir fixing that and offering uid plus capabilities.
> For those
At first I have to clarify there are issues with javamaildir-0.6.2. It
has problems in storing many mails per (milli)second. I am working on a
release of javamaildir fixing that and offering uid plus capabilities.
For those who are curios I could send an unofficial zip by private email.
Norm
I just installed it an run a test. I get the follow execption:
27/05/06 20:46:00 INFO James.Mailet: Error while storing mail.
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error in
getUserInbox.org.apache.avalon.framework.se
rvice.ServiceException: Cannot find or init repository (Key='')
at org.apache.jame
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-461?page=comments#action_12413591 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-461:
-
Just after a quick review it seems to be nice work. Will install it tomorrow
and test it a bit . Thx for your help and work.
> Javam
Author: norman
Date: Sat May 27 11:23:51 2006
New Revision: 409853
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=409853&view=rev
Log:
-Code cleanup
-Add more javadocs
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/SPF.java
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/core/
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-461?page=all ]
Joachim Draeger updated JAMES-461:
--
Attachment: JavamailStoreMailRepository2.zip
This proposal has no other dependencies than Javamail (i think even before 1.4)
and James.
HashJavamailStoreM
Author: norman
Date: Sat May 27 10:23:31 2006
New Revision: 409843
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=409843&view=rev
Log:
Add and correct more javadocs
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/DNSServiceXBillImpl.java
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/ja
Stefano,
I'm having trouble determining whether I think this is a helpful
refactoring based on the diffs. Do you have a before and after
view?... maybe ViewSVN link to the point before you started to
changes, and then a download of the source afterward?
I like the idea of making the code format
Author: norman
Date: Sat May 27 07:21:35 2006
New Revision: 409829
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=409829&view=rev
Log:
Add junit test for tempError and getRecords.
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/james/jspf/SPF1TestMockDNSService.java
james/jspf/trunk/src/t
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Imho the better name would be project. Under the James "TLP" Umbrella
we produce the following projects:
[...]
I like Noel's 'products' better.
I like both project (+1) and product (+0.8).
I don't have problems with subproject (+0.5)
I'm -0 to mo
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Stefano,
One question: The refactoring you are providing, does it work? (Did you
run it? Did you test all the features and functionality beforehand and
afterwards?)
I already wrote I don't have run james with the refactored version: it
takes time to do this things. I
Stefano,
One question: The refactoring you are providing, does it work? (Did you
run it? Did you test all the features and functionality beforehand and
afterwards?)
I agree with Steve that a refactoring is not worth applying if we don't
know if it doesn't breaks something, regardeless how si
Author: bago
Date: Sat May 27 05:53:12 2006
New Revision: 409826
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=409826&view=rev
Log:
Added automatic reports submenus to the site.xml layout, added a few reports
(pmd, xref, todos, clover) to the default site generation. (related to JSPF-6)
Modified:
ja
Søren Hilmer wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Just to be sure I understood your comment when you say "POM" you mean
the SDL ?
Well, now you got me :-) What do you mean by SDL?
By POM I mean "Project Object Model", to me that is more than the pom.xml. But
the model or layout of the project as such.
SDL i
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Imho the better name would be project. Under the James "TLP" Umbrella we
produce the following projects:
- Server: SMTP/POP3/NNTP daemon
- jSieve: SIEVE library in java
- Mime4j: MIME library in java
- jSPF: SPF library in java
- Postage: SMTP/POP3 stress test tool in java
Hi Stefano,
>
> Just to be sure I understood your comment when you say "POM" you mean
> the SDL ?
Well, now you got me :-) What do you mean by SDL?
By POM I mean "Project Object Model", to me that is more than the pom.xml. But
the model or layout of the project as such.
And Maven have a preferr
I would like to add an example:
In James 2.1 we had FetchPOP
In James 2.2.0 FetchMail has been introduced and FetchPop deprecated.
Fetchmail was a complete rewrite and had no unit tests, and has been
introduced in a minor (2.#) release.
Does this mean that if I rename the refactored code to
Am Samstag, den 27.05.2006, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Serge Knystautas wrote:
> > I've noticed we have/are rapidly added/ing many "subprojects" to
> > James. The term "subproject" is something of a loaded term at Apache,
> > so wanted to a) have group discuss how they see these as rel
Am Samstag, den 27.05.2006, 12:56 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Serge,
> >
> >> The term "subproject" is something of a loaded term at Apache
> >
> > Thanks for posting this. I'd started and stopped the same e-mail about
> > three times. Primarily, because I want t
Serge Knystautas wrote:
I've noticed we have/are rapidly added/ing many "subprojects" to
James. The term "subproject" is something of a loaded term at Apache,
so wanted to a) have group discuss how they see these as related and
b) be intentional in the term we're using.
1. How these code bases
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Serge,
The term "subproject" is something of a loaded term at Apache
Thanks for posting this. I'd started and stopped the same e-mail about
three times. Primarily, because I want to doublecheck to make sure that the
IP for jSPF and then Postage is handled properly. W
Steve Brewin wrote:
As you will have gathered, I don't think this is a good way of proposing a
major change in a component.
What would be a better way? I can't see anything better than the real
code to have concrete discussion.
My main issue is purely practical. I think it seriously unwise
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-512?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara reassigned JAMES-512:
-
Assign To: Stefano Bagnara
> OutOfMemoryError -- object not released.
>
>
> Key: JAMES-512
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-512?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara updated JAMES-512:
--
Fix Version: 2.3.0a4
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> OutOfMemoryError -- object not released.
>
>
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-512?page=comments#action_12413568 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-512:
---
Can you search the logs for these strings:
"Exception caught while storing a stream" WARN level (maybe in objectstorage)
"Exceptio
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-6?page=comments#action_12413564
]
Norman Maurer commented on JSPF-6:
--
Just add the first xdocs. Please review.
I use the coding-standarts text from james site. Hope this is ok. Otherwise
just tell me and i remov
Author: norman
Date: Sat May 27 00:05:47 2006
New Revision: 409815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=409815&view=rev
Log:
Add xdoc for site generation. See JSPF-6
Added:
james/jspf/trunk/src/site/
james/jspf/trunk/src/site/site.xml
james/jspf/trunk/src/site/xdoc/
james/jspf/tr
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-6?page=all ]
Norman Maurer reassigned JSPF-6:
Assign To: Norman Maurer
> Add a few xdocs for the site generation
> ---
>
> Key: JSPF-6
> URL: http://issues.
28 matches
Mail list logo
