Author: norman
Date: Thu Oct 5 23:55:26 2006
New Revision: 453513
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453513
Log:
Remove the initalizeFallback method and use lazy initalization
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/SPF.java
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/src/
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-641?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-641.
-
Fix Version/s: Trunk
Resolution: Fixed
> POP3 list return messages in order as they comes with file pair
> -
Author: norman
Date: Thu Oct 5 23:44:59 2006
New Revision: 453510
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453510
Log:
Add comment to for sorting feature. Thx to davide.bz. See JAMES-641
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/conf/james-config.xml
Modified: james/server/trunk/src/conf/james
That sound good. Any other ideas ?
Guillermo Grandes schrieb:
+1 (If I can vote) BUT with a minor note (as Stefano says) or ideas:
I prefer parameters documented, no-hidden, with a Note in config.xml,
and when it is possible, the parameters that are used to perhaps
indicate one feature/worka
So? It too or I didn't (do you in communication with hating eyes soldier and what would be found space could be well, if
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add info in about HELO/EHLO in "Received:" Header
-
Key: JAMES-652
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-652
Project: James
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SMTPServer
From: "Jürgen Hoffmann":
to Normans Luck, I am the Boss who actually heard of the RFC and actually
knows what JAMES is capable of. And I make the technology decisions AND I
have to bare with them. Plus I try to keep my Boss out of Normans Back,
when James gives us trouble at some installation
+1 (If I can vote) BUT with a minor note (as Stefano says) or ideas:
I prefer parameters documented, no-hidden, with a Note in config.xml, and
when it is possible, the parameters that are used to perhaps indicate one
feature/workarround not-RFC could be named according to this, as example:
Hi Bernd,
I didn't want to leave the impression that I took something personal,
sorry.
I really appreciate your input. And in fact you did re-animated the
discussion and hit important topics and I argued eagerly.
And just because I don't want to complain endlessly about stalling
discussions I
Hi,
to Normans Luck, I am the Boss who actually heard of the RFC and
actually knows what JAMES is capable of. And I make the technology
decisions AND I have to bare with them. Plus I try to keep my Boss out
of Normans Back, when James gives us trouble at some installations.
As I showed my Bo
mmm... well, I have imagination... both are byteaction
family?
the "evil" boss?
the suffered sysadmin?
another suffered developer?
the reincarnation of Elvis?
ok, ok, I surrender :-)
Have a nice day! :-)
Guillermo
- Original Message -
From: "Jürgen Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-649?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-649.
-
Fix Version/s: Trunk
Resolution: Fixed
seems to be fixed.
> error "OutOfMemoryError: JAVA HEAP SPACE" in connections log file when doing
> a POP TOP f
Hi Guillermo,
not only yours ;) ask Norman about it ;) and then ask yourself who I
might be ;)
kind regards
Jürgen
Guillermo Grandes schrieb:
Hi Jürgen,
Wow, you have described my life! :-)
See also mail:
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-648) Corrupted MIME message [...]
Sent: Tue,
+1
Danny Angus schrieb:
All,
Please indicate your vote in the usual way (+1,0,-1) for the following:
The standards compliance policy statement on
http://james.apache.org/server/design_objectives.html is a pragmatic
one.
However the idea that the documentation be hidden is flawed, as it
highlig
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-641?page=all ]
Norman Maurer reassigned JAMES-641:
---
Assignee: Norman Maurer
You are right. There is a lack in the documentation. I will take care.. Thx for
reporting
> POP3 list return messages in order as
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-641?page=comments#action_12440208 ]
davide.bz commented on JAMES-641:
-
The suggestion I have maded is wrong. I have debug the code ... a sort is
already there without code modification (but where is d
Author: bago
Date: Thu Oct 5 09:43:45 2006
New Revision: 453285
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453285
Log:
Removed unused methods constants to reach 76.5% coverage (ok this is cheating
;-) )
Moved service implementations with dependencies in the impl package (we could
even move
On 05/10/06, Raghavendra Setty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Can you please share some thought on how can i do these two (sent item
and read/unread) at client side if not at James side? (may be the
approach)
You use UIDL to get the ID's of the messages and maintain a local list
of states of m
Author: bago
Date: Thu Oct 5 08:53:51 2006
New Revision: 453276
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453276
Log:
Removed SPFInternalResult (we don't use it anymore)
Moved DefaultExplanationPolicy to policies.local
Introduced a common abstract SPFResultException to be used as the root
Just to say that we for sure help Guillermo to try fixin it with a
costum way. But i don't think that the fix will get in james code base.
bye
Norman
Norman Maurer (JIRA) schrieb:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-648?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-648.
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-648?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-648.
-
Fix Version/s: Trunk
Resolution: Won't Fix
The 8bit problem is fixed now.
I don'T think we find a solution how to handle on the two Content-Type headers
Hi Guillermo,
i think thats exactly the point! If you want to alter/modify a message
and the message is not rfc complicant you must expect such problems. I
don't think there is many we can do. Maybe we could "rename" on of the
Content-Type headers but i think that is not a good solution.
If
Hi Norman!
If I don't use James, the message is passed to other server (IIS, Exchange,
etc) untouched... (nothing changes)
IMHO, I think that these other servers don't see the content, only envelope
and nothing more (If James is configured without any mailet, James acts as
an standard server
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-33?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JSPF-33.
---
Fix Version/s: 0.9b4
Resolution: Fixed
forgot to close it
> Use commons cli for commandline parsing
> ---
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem:
This correction has bad collateral effects. Actually, when I launched now 10 000 messages
(10 Kos) with NO DELAY between 2 messages, I've got an error "not possible to listen
on port 25" on my program for few of messages.
Sorry, I don't understand the collat
Author: bago
Date: Thu Oct 5 07:09:51 2006
New Revision: 453243
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453243
Log:
Forgot to remove the localpolicy empty package
Removed:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/localpolicy/
-
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/terms/RedirectModifier.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jspf/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/jspf/terms/RedirectModifier.java?view=diff&rev=453241&r1=453240&r2=453241
==
Problem:
This correction has bad collateral effects. Actually, when I launched now 10
000 messages (10 Kos) with NO DELAY between 2 messages, I've got an error "not
possible to listen on port 25" on my program for few of messages.
-Message d'origine-
De : LORIDAN Maxime - EXT
Envoyé :
Hi Jürgen,
Wow, you have described my life! :-)
See also mail:
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-648) Corrupted MIME message [...]
Sent: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:25:01 +0200
really I am surprised.
Thanks,
Guillermo
- Original Message -
From: "Jürgen Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
On 05/10/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I think that we should simply add a small sentence and a
link/reference to the big statement.
Hope this can be considered in this vote.
Seems reasonable to me.
-
To
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it works!
Thanks!
PS: Do you know if this code will be included in the next version of JAMES?
Unfortunately we are in the last RC phase of our current release and it
is unlikely we'll include this in 2.3.0.
2.3.1 or 2.4.0 will include this fix for sure.
So unl
+1 BUT with a minor note: I think that "the documentation MUST contain
the following statement" and then a 6 sentece statement is too much as
the requirement. We'll probably have minor things that will need this
disclaimer and it would not make sense to paste 20 lines of comments
above every co
+1
:-) wow, what a comeback!
Bernd
On 10/5/06, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Please indicate your vote in the usual way (+1,0,-1) for the following:
The standards compliance policy statement on
http://james.apache.org/server/design_objectives.html is a pragmatic
one.
However th
We will vote for it... For me it should be in the next Version.
Thx for testing .
bye
Norman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Yes it works!
Thanks!
PS: Do you know if this code will be included in the next version of JAMES?
-Message d'origine-
De : Stefano Bagnara (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Yes it works!
Thanks!
PS: Do you know if this code will be included in the next version of JAMES?
-Message d'origine-
De : Stefano Bagnara (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 octobre 2006 17:55
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [jira] Commented: (JAMES-649) error "OutOfMemo
Danny Angus schrieb:
All,
Please indicate your vote in the usual way (+1,0,-1) for the following:
The standards compliance policy statement on
http://james.apache.org/server/design_objectives.html is a pragmatic
one.
However the idea that the documentation be hidden is flawed, as it
highlights
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-643?page=comments#action_12440123 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-643:
-
I removed all usage. Only some usage is left in mailets. The mailets are:
org.apache.james.transport.mailets:
* AbstractR
All,
Please indicate your vote in the usual way (+1,0,-1) for the following:
The standards compliance policy statement on
http://james.apache.org/server/design_objectives.html is a pragmatic
one.
However the idea that the documentation be hidden is flawed, as it
highlights neither the feature no
well, we discussed this already, see thread
"[jira] Commented: (JAMES-644) FileRegexMatcher possibly leaks minor
memory on startup"
my opinion did not change. I share Stefanos view, below.
Bernd
On 10/5/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> should
On 10/5/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> On 10/4/06, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [...]
>> It's like every time at the James project. A proposal is done, some
>> discussion raises up. If a "religious" architecture topic is hit like
>> "too
Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
Danny Angus wrote:
On 05/10/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone see the need for a more formal vote about the patch and/or
the policy? if yes, please speak up now.
No.
The policy is a pragmatic one, the idea that the documentation be
hidden is
Danny Angus wrote:
On 05/10/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone see the need for a more formal vote about the patch and/or
the policy? if yes, please speak up now.
No.
The policy is a pragmatic one, the idea that the documentation be
hidden is flawed, it highlights nei
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-552?page=all ]
Norman Maurer updated JAMES-552:
Assignee: (was: Norman Maurer)
Unassign me. I will not work on this in the near future. Maybe some other
commiter want to do
> Clamav code should be moved
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-555?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-555.
-
Resolution: Fixed
now we have mysql, msql and derby. Derby was the most importent , so i close
this.
> Bayesiananalysis should support not only mysql and ms
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-637?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-637.
-
Fix Version/s: Trunk
Resolution: Fixed
commited to trunk. The problem is that the junit test mostly fail cause of
buggy mstor. so i not added the junit
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-644?page=all ]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-644.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> FileRegexMatcher possibly leaks minor memory on startup
> ---
>
> Key:
On 05/10/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone see the need for a more formal vote about the patch and/or
the policy? if yes, please speak up now.
No.
The policy is a pragmatic one, the idea that the documentation be
hidden is flawed, it highlights neither the feature nor
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi all,
should we backport the follow minor patch to 2.3 branch :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-644
bye
Norman
-0
The only problem is a single file descriptor kept open while running:
nothing to call home for.
I would do this only if we'll need a further
FastFail statistics
---
Key: JAMES-651
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-651
Project: James
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Norman Maurer
Assigned To: Bernd Fondermann
Priority
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-52?page=comments#action_12440085 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-52:
After move to javamail-1.4.1ea the 8bit stuff seems to work :-) all which are
intressted should checkout the current trunk
Hi all,
should we backport the follow minor patch to 2.3 branch :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-644
bye
Norman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First of all thx for this wonderfull mail. I needed 5 minutes to stop
laughting.. I think now my girlfriend really think im crayz ;-)
You really got it! Thats exactly the Story which every admin knows...
And yes I fully agree with you.
So i whould temporary add the patch posted at:
http://issues.a
Norman Maurer wrote:
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
ok, I see you want it for 2.3.0... ;-)
Bernd
I want many things for 2.3.0. But i think we should be releastic ;-) So
maybe we can put out a 2.4 which support 8bit. Anyway i can also wait
for 3.0 or whatever version we use..
bye
Norman
We
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
On 10/5/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
> On 10/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The main problem is that now the "next-release" depends on the
release
>> of 2 final libraries:
>>
>> dnsjava-2.0.3
>> javamail-1
On 10/5/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
> On 10/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The main problem is that now the "next-release" depends on the release
>> of 2 final libraries:
>>
>> dnsjava-2.0.3
>> javamail-1.4.1
>>
>> Let's hope they wo
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
On 10/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I saw that glassfish/mail had new commits a couple of weeks ago that
fixed some of the bugs I reported few months ago.
I also saw that the java.net maven repository is publishing a build from
15/Sep/2006 d
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On 10/4/06, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
It's like every time at the James project. A proposal is done, some
discussion raises up. If a "religious" architecture topic is hit like
"too much protocol dependent" there is a lot of discussion for a short
ti
On 10/4/06, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bernd,
Am Dienstag, den 03.10.2006, 13:34 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
> while I see there has been some discussion about this mixed in here,
> what is the current architectural target for this?
> currently, I am having problems to de
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Norman Maurer wrote:
JAMES does not use JavaMail for storage (it is bad enough for what we do
use
it for). In fact, with a wee bit of work, JavaMail will be entirely
removed
from the POP3 codepath.
Who said that we remove it entirely ?
From that particular code
Am Donnerstag, den 05.10.2006, 02:34 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> But with one major flaw: it depends upon JavaMail, and JavaMail wants to
> instantiate the MimeMessage. WE DO NOT NEED A MIMEMESSAGE FOR POP3. We
> only need the stream.
I agree. I also don't like the idea of creating a Mime
Hi Guillermo,
just an question .. How looks the message if you not use james ? It have
still to Content-Type headers ?
bye
Norman
Guillermo Grandes schrieb:
EHLO Stefano :-)
I have test this, work "half" ;-)
Now body is not corrupted, Content-Transfer-Encoding is set to 8bit,
but the head
Norman Maurer wrote:
Jürgen Hoffmann schrieb:
Hi Danny,
[...]
Kind regards
Juergen Hoffmann
First of all thx for this wonderfull mail. I needed 5 minutes to stop
laughting.. I think now my girlfriend really think im crayz ;-)
You really got it! Thats exactly the Story which every admin knows
63 matches
Mail list logo
