Re: [jsieve][PROPOSAL] Release 0.2

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> this release has been hanging around for quite a while now. norman's >> been really busy so i unless he has some time now or there are other >> volunteers, i'm willing to act as rele

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good >> for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the >> difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script. >

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

2008-08-06 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano Bagnara wrote: > The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good > for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the > difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script. That is correct. We have a CI at the ASF. The nightly wasn't intended to replace

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly BuildReport)

2008-08-06 Thread Norman Maurer
Am Mittwoch, den 06.08.2008, 13:53 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > Norman Maurer wrote: > > > > We've talked about having a JAMES zone for testing. > > > I think a zone is fine for testing but please not another CI instance > > running. > > Absolutely. We agree. We want the zone for TESTING o

svn commit: r683370 - /james/mailet/project/

2008-08-06 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Aug 6 11:58:34 2008 New Revision: 683370 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683370&view=rev Log: Doh! Already have 'current' so let's us that! Removed: james/mailet/project/ - To unsubscribe, e

svn commit: r683369 - /james/mailet/project/

2008-08-06 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Aug 6 11:55:44 2008 New Revision: 683369 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683369&view=rev Log: Adding space for consolidated mailets site build Added: james/mailet/project/ - To unsubscribe,

svn commit: r683367 - in /james/project/trunk/project/src/site: site.xml xdoc/index.xml

2008-08-06 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Aug 6 11:53:13 2008 New Revision: 683367 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683367&view=rev Log: Change from Mailet API to Mailets in preparation for sorting out mailet products build. Disingenuous apologies for adding purple prose. Modified: james/project/trunk

Re: [PROPOSAL] add one more "layer" to the server.trunk ant build

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I propose that we introduce a new kind (or two) of module at the same >>> level >>> of the api mod

svn commit: r683347 - in /james/server/trunk/build-tools: base-build.xml build.xml common-build.xml module-build.xml

2008-08-06 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Aug 6 11:11:44 2008 New Revision: 683347 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683347&view=rev Log: Renamed base-build to common-build. Added: james/server/trunk/build-tools/common-build.xml - copied, changed from r683338, james/server/trunk/build-tools/base-

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly BuildReport)

2008-08-06 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Norman Maurer wrote: > > We've talked about having a JAMES zone for testing. > I think a zone is fine for testing but please not another CI instance > running. Absolutely. We agree. We want the zone for TESTING of JAMES, not a CI. :-) --- Noel --

Re: [server.trunk] user-api and user-library package names

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMA

Re: [site] Staging Instructions Update

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: >> >> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: >>> >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: i've run into a few problems building and staging the main site as per http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/

[jira] Updated: (MIME4J-57) Add a max limit to header length for parsing.

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-57: -- Priority: Critical (was: Major) Increase the priority because this result in a DoS. > Add a ma

[jira] Updated: (MIME4J-57) Add a max limit to header length for parsing.

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-57: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.4) > Add a max limit to header length for parsing. >

[jira] Updated: (MIME4J-69) Decoding/encoding is not coherent between headers and body

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-69: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.4) 0.5 > Decoding/encoding is not coherent between

[jira] Updated: (MIME4J-27) [JW#7] Limitations Support

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara updated MIME4J-27: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.4) 0.5 > [JW#7] Limitations Support >

Re: [site] Staging Instructions Update

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: i've run into a few problems building and staging the main site as per http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/project/trunk/HOWTO.txt whenever i run mvn -U -Plocal,parent clean install site:stage -Dstaging

svn commit: r683243 - in /james/project/trunk: pom.xml project/ project/pom.xml project/server/2.2.0/pom.xml project/server/pom.xml project/src/site/site.xml src/site/site.xml

2008-08-06 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Wed Aug 6 05:15:36 2008 New Revision: 683243 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683243&view=rev Log: Updated internal dependencies. Fix mave-site-plugin to 2.0-beta5 because newer plugins create issues (bad bannerLeft inheritance, bad site.xml descriptor deployed). Modifie

Re: [site] Staging Instructions Update

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: i've run into a few problems building and staging the main site as per http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/project/trunk/HOWTO.txt whenever i run mvn -U -Plocal,parent clean install site:stage -DstagingDirectory=/opt/development/wo

Re: [site] Staging Instructions Update

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: i've run into a few problems building and staging the main site as per http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/project/trunk/HOWTO.txt whenever i run mvn -U -Plocal,parent clean install site:stage -DstagingDirectory=/opt/development/workspace/james-site (for examp

Re: [mime4j] what else need to be done (Was: Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4)

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Niklas Therning ha scritto: Stefano Bagnara wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:52, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMHO this one (use the new structure but move some class

Re: [mime4j] what else need to be done (Was: Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4)

2008-08-06 Thread Niklas Therning
Stefano Bagnara wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:52, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMHO this one (use the new structure but move some class from parser to main) is the

Re: [Mime4j] Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Niklas Therning ha scritto: Bernd Fondermann wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:51, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in trunk vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :) Please le

Re: [jsieve][PROPOSAL] Release 0.2

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: this release has been hanging around for quite a while now. norman's been really busy so i unless he has some time now or there are other volunteers, i'm willing to act as release manager for 0.2. unless anyone jumps in now, i'll prepare a release candidate in t

Re: [PROPOSAL] add one more "layer" to the server.trunk ant build

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I propose that we introduce a new kind (or two) of module at the same level of the api module, so it would be: - deployments - functions - libraries - apis | commons | utils [...] ATM I

Re: [server.trunk] user-api and user-library package names

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: we have these packages in user-api: o.a.j.vut o.a.j.api.user o.a.j.ser

JAMES Server Nightly Build Report

2008-08-06 Thread JAMES Nightly Build System
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below: -

Re: [mime4j] what else need to be done (Was: Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4)

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:52, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMHO this one (use the new structure but move some class from parser to main) is the worst of the 5 analyzed

Re: [postage] refresh

2008-08-06 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:34, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I checked out postage to revamp the build and make sure it is self contained and build like every other product we have in the repository. :-) Great, thanks. I locally updated both