On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I propose that we introduce a new kind (or two) of module at the same >>> level >>> of the api module, so it would be: >>> - deployments >>> - functions >>> - libraries >>> - apis | commons | utils >>> [...] >>> ATM I would go with the -util suffix. >> >> [...] >>> >>> Opinions? >> >> as i read this proposal, it's not really adding any more layers, just >> allowing more types of module in the lowest layer. basically, we add >> one or two more naming conventions for modules that behave like APIs. >> i'm reluctant to add more layers and would strongly prefer JAMES to be >> coupled just by APIs but this proposal seems a reasonable stepping >> stone to me. > > Cool! Thank you for "rewording" my proposal. You got it exactly how I > thought it :-)
i should have the ant for this work very soon - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
