Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose that we introduce a new kind (or two) of module at the same level
of the api module, so it would be:
- deployments
- functions
- libraries
- apis | commons | utils
[...]
ATM I would go with the -util suffix.
[...]
Opinions?
as i read this proposal, it's not really adding any more layers, just
allowing more types of module in the lowest layer. basically, we add
one or two more naming conventions for modules that behave like APIs.
i'm reluctant to add more layers and would strongly prefer JAMES to be
coupled just by APIs but this proposal seems a reasonable stepping
stone to me.
Cool! Thank you for "rewording" my proposal. You got it exactly how I
thought it :-)
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
