Re: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-21 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Danny, you expressed *perfectly* my thinkings. Vincenzo Danny Angus wrote: On 10/19/06, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can we just discuss the underlying issue? Noel knows this software inside and out and made the majority of the commits for a couple of years there. Now he doe

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-20 Thread Danny Angus
On 10/19/06, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can we just discuss the underlying issue? Noel knows this software inside and out and made the majority of the commits for a couple of years there. Now he doesn't have time to check emails daily and always participate timely in a very ac

RE: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-19 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Serge Knystautas wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > See the final paragraph of that page. People get a > bit "rule happy", and that's never good. > You did not make your point but argued about the rules, > so you were being just as "rule happy" as Stefano. Actually, I wasn't referring to Stefa

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-19 Thread Serge Knystautas
On 10/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: See the final paragraph of that page. People get a bit "rule happy", and that's never good. Noel, I think this is unfair. You did not make your point but argued about the rules, so you were being just as "rule happy" as Stefano. Can we

[LONG] About voting rules (Was: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk)

2006-10-17 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Stefano Bagnara wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Ok, 3 days passed. Code changes can be vetoed at any time, resulting only in the inability to cut a release containing them. it seems that we followed the right procedure. You followed a procedure. The point is tha

RE: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: >>> Ok, 3 days passed. >> Code changes can be vetoed at any time, resulting only in the inability to >> cut a release containing them. > it seems that we followed the right procedure. You followed a procedure. The point is that code votes are nev

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-17 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Ok, 3 days passed. Code changes can be vetoed at any time, resulting only in the inability to cut a release containing them. --- Noel Sorry but I don't understand your sentence. I just read again the http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html and it seems

RE: [VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Ok, 3 days passed. Code changes can be vetoed at any time, resulting only in the inability to cut a release containing them. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI

[VOTE RESULT] Merge IMAP code to trunk

2006-10-16 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Ok, 3 days passed. +1 Norman Maurer (binding) Stefano Bagnara (binding) Guillermo Grandes Joachim Draeger Bernd Fondermann (binding) Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini (binding) +/- 0 none -1 none I will merge it asap. Stefano Norman Maurer wrote: Hi all, i just want to start this vote for mergin t