Nice you got it fixed.
Bye,
Norman
2010/10/30 Eric Charles :
> I just rebuilt 2.3.2 web site (with mvn3 and bago repo commented in
> pom.xml).
> Will redeploy with new skin this weekend.
> Tks,
>
> Eric
>
>
> On 26/10/2010 13:10, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>
>> 2010/10/26 Eric Charles:
>>>
>>> I wou
I just rebuilt 2.3.2 web site (with mvn3 and bago repo commented in
pom.xml).
Will redeploy with new skin this weekend.
Tks,
Eric
On 26/10/2010 13:10, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
2010/10/26 Eric Charles:
I would like to propose a new menu
Sever 3.0
Server 2.3.2
Archive
... and move t
On 26/10/2010 13:10, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
(snipped)
If ok with this, there is 3 actions:
- Republish 2.3.2: I tried to build the site, but it fails to download the
needed dependency. I will retry from another internet connection.
ok. Maybe 2.3 needs maven 2 because maven 3 deprecated/removed
+1
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ links to
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/james/james-server-container-spring/3.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/
The menu will not contain the link to the correct snapshot artifact (ant
will not contain the link to hudsonn, I wil
I think we don't need the dir anymore. We could just link to the
nightly builds done by hudson.
For example:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/james/james-server-container-spring/3.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/
Bye
Norman
2010/10/27 Eric Charles :
> Hi All,
>
> - Server V2 and S
Hi All,
- Server V2 and Server V3 sounds really good. I will also create new
directories to contains those sites so the menu of other sites are still
valid when going from 3M1 to 3M2 to 3beta1,... "server3" will represent
the current v3 and other web subsites menus will point to it.
- Sure,
2010/10/26 Stefano Bagnara :
> 2010/10/26 Eric Charles :
>> I would like to propose a new menu
>> Sever 3.0
>> Server 2.3.2
>> Archive
>>
>> ... and move the Server 2.3.1, 2.3.0, 2.2.0 to the Archive page.
>>
>> The 2.3.2 would need to get regenerated and republished.
>
> +1, maybe "Server
2010/10/26 Eric Charles :
> I would like to propose a new menu
> Sever 3.0
> Server 2.3.2
> Archive
>
> ... and move the Server 2.3.1, 2.3.0, 2.2.0 to the Archive page.
>
> The 2.3.2 would need to get regenerated and republished.
+1, maybe "Server v3" and "Server v2" are more general for
+1
Kind Regards... Dhrubo
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Eric Charles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The left menu of http://james.apache.org/server/index.html has now:
>
>Development 3.0
>Candidate 2.3.2
>Server 2.3.1
>Server 2.3.0
>Server 2.2.0
>Archive
>
> If you click for exampl
