On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as you all prolly know I tried to decouple james in the last couple of
> weeks from phoenix / avalon as much as possible. This task is now
> complete and James should "just work" within every container /
> framework which underst
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Eric MacAdie wrote:
>> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I
>> am running James on a VPS host with about 256 MB of memory, and right
>> now James uses about 50 MB or so. I noticed from
>> http://people.apa
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I am
> running James on a VPS host with about 256 MB of memory, and right now James
> uses about 50 MB or so. I noticed from
> http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/b
Eric MacAdie wrote:
> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I
> am running James on a VPS host with about 256 MB of memory, and right
> now James uses about 50 MB or so. I noticed from
> http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/bin/ that the Spring
> version is t
Hi Eric,
I don't expect the pure-spring deployment to take more memory then the
phoenix deployment do when its complete. So stay tuned...
Bye,
Norman
2009/12/26 Eric MacAdie :
> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I am
> running James on a VPS host with about 25
Nice point Eric.
I will try to carry out a test and let you know.
Till that time you continue with the older stable version.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I am
> running James on a VPS host with about 2
I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I
am running James on a VPS host with about 256 MB of memory, and right
now James uses about 50 MB or so. I noticed from
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/bin/ that the Spring
version is twice as big as the Phoenix
Good point.. Anyway I think I will start to work on this these days
(in a sandbox) just because I will have some time ;) If others think
it was a bad idea at the end I will be happy to just > /dev/null it
and threat it as an funny experiment ;)
Thx for the input.
Bye,
Norman
2009/12/26 Bernd Fon
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as you all prolly know I tried to decouple james in the last couple of
> weeks from phoenix / avalon as much as possible. This task is now
> complete and James should "just work" within every container /
> framework which understand howto handle jsr250 injections
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok because I didn't hear anything against this route I will go ahead
> and try to get this stuff done.
Mmmh. I think you should give this another week or so to sink in. For
example, I am only now checking my email since days. Other might also
want to join in after the holida
No I just poped out the idea since we were considering putting James in OSGi
Anyways if there is not enough time we can for this time stick to just
spring
I am very keen to contribute into this code into Spring. Let me know how I
can be of some use.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Norman Maurer
To Be honest, I never used spring-dm but used Spring alot. What is the
benifit of using spring-dm ? Is it just OSGI?
Thx
Norman
2009/12/26, Dhrubo :
> Hi,
> Since you are trying Spring ... why not with Spring DM just a thought?
> Thanks ...dhrubo
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Norman Mau
Hi,
Since you are trying Spring ... why not with Spring DM just a thought?
Thanks ...dhrubo
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok because I didn't hear anything against this route I will go ahead
> and try to get this stuff done.
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
> 2009/12/22 Dhrubo :
Ok because I didn't hear anything against this route I will go ahead
and try to get this stuff done.
Bye,
Norman
2009/12/22 Dhrubo :
> Friends,
> Move towards pure Spring away from dead frameworks is highly
> appreciated. I think the move to a OSGi container may come in next release?
>
Friends,
Move towards pure Spring away from dead frameworks is highly
appreciated. I think the move to a OSGi container may come in next release?
Thanks ...dhrubo
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as you all prolly know I tried to decouple james in th
Hi all,
as you all prolly know I tried to decouple james in the last couple of
weeks from phoenix / avalon as much as possible. This task is now
complete and James should "just work" within every container /
framework which understand howto handle jsr250 injections. I thought
about using OSGI + Ka
16 matches
Mail list logo
