Re: Current abuse of James 2.3.0 as open relay

I don't know if this will help but in the past I've used this public SMTP testing web site [1] before and found it very useful. It attempts more and more devious tests on your server and reports what it found. David Legg [1] http://www.test-smtp.com/

Re: Current abuse of James 2.3.0 as open relay

Yikes, my server failed test 15, too. It says I'm an open relay! I'm not sure what to change in my config, which is pretty much default. Any ideas? Thanks, Don On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Legg schrieb: I don't know if this will help but

Re: Current abuse of James 2.3.0 as open relay

Ole Ersoy schrieb: Is it discarding it or trying to notify the sender that the mail can't be delivered, but the sender is rejecting the notification? With the default configuration, James is indeed discarding the mail. It seems as if James is not interpreting the % in addresses like

Re: Current abuse of James 2.3.0 as open relay

Don Smith wrote: Yikes, my server failed test 15, too. It says I'm an open relay! I'm not sure what to change in my config, which is pretty much default. Any ideas? Don't worry too much. I tried this test a while ago and it also failed at around test 15. I think the author has re-vamped

Re: Current abuse of James 2.3.0 as open relay

Actually just for the record I tried my server and it failed on test 18 ;-) It probably means James' code needs a little more tightening for these edge cases. David Legg Test 15/28 RSET 250 2.0.0 OK MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK RCPT TO:

Re: Current abuse of James 2.3.0 as open relay

David Legg ha scritto: Actually just for the record I tried my server and it failed on test 18 ;-) It probably means James' code needs a little more tightening for these edge cases. Test 18/28 RSET 250 2.0.0 OK MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK

Re: Current abuse of James 2.3.0 as open relay

Good stuff, thanks Stephano. On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Legg ha scritto: Actually just for the record I tried my server and it failed on test 18 ;-) It probably means James' code needs a little more tightening for these edge cases.

Request for help on starting a SMTP server using James

Hi,I am trying to use a SMTP server for my project and I tried to run the run.bat for the James Mail Server 2.3.1 but it did not work. The error that appeared is:org.apache.avalon.phoenix.containerkit.lifecycle.LifecycleException:Component named 'smtp server' failed to pass through the

Re: Request for help on starting a SMTP server using James

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Anais Yong Fah Yin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to use a SMTP server for my project and I tried to run the run.bat for the James Mail Server 2.3.1 but it did not work. The error that appeared is: