Good stuff, thanks Stephano. On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Legg ha scritto: > >> Actually just for the record I tried my server and it failed on test 18 >> ;-) >> >> It probably means James' code needs a little more tightening for these >> edge cases. >> >> Test 18/28 >> >> >>> RSET >> <<< 250 2.0.0 OK >> >>> MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> <<< 250 2.1.0 Sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK >> >>> RCPT TO: <"test%spam.com"> >> <<< 250 2.1.5 Recipient <"test%spam.com"@localhost> OK >> >> >> Host is an open relay ! >> > > > Why? JAMES is not delivering the mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it instead will > deliver it to the local use "test%spam.com" if existing. The % is like any > other char to james, so there is no harm in using it. > The above check should use its own domain instead of "spam.com" and check > for real if the server is forwarding such a mail to that domain. > > So it is a bug in the test, not in JAMES. > > Stefano > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
