should I wait for the DKIM standard which
will likely replace the current domain keys standard?
Info on both domain keys and DKIM can be found at
http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys.
Sincerely,
Tom Brown
-
To unsubscribe, e
specific
domain during the last 24 hours, and how many of those were successful
(or failures).
I did not see anything like this in the documenation, but I might have
missed something. Is there anything existing for JAMES that would
allow me to track this information?
Thanks in advance,
Tom Brown
james log (that's not the mailet log) from
inside a mailet?
Thank in advance!
Tom Brown
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did the legal folks ever get back to you on whether or not an
implementation of domain keys can be included?
-- Tom
On 10/13/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Yahoo!'s DomainKeys Intellectual Property may be licensed under either
>> of the following terms:
Hi Philip,
I suspect you want a matcher that allows you to match messages based
on the address that any reply would be sent to, is that correct?
Have you checked the "SenderIs", "SenderIsNull", and "SenderIsRegex" matchers?
Tom
On 11/25/06, Philip Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
Hi,
By hard-fail and soft-fail do you mean the difference between a
permanent failure (such as user does not exist) and temporary failure
(mailbox is full). These types of failures are different from bounces.
The difference is whether or not the mail server accepts
responsibility for delivering t
Hi Guys!
I just thought I'd mention that I've got an implementation of the
Domain Keys sender verification standard about 95% completed (it
correctly validates most messages, but some systems don't correctly
interpret the signature).
I wanted to include it with JAMES itself, but there was a ques
work better than any single approach.
Tom
On 12/22/06, JWM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does Domain Keys Sender Verification differ from SPF? Do they work in
parallel? Or do you chose one or the other?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Does the "Forward" mailet modify the front of the subject line? If
not, I suspect that the forward mailet will keep spawning new messages
(with something tacked on the end of the subject). Each new message
still matches, and will spawn a new one with an even longer subject
line...
I don't know if
I haven't checked out the trunk, but the log configuration provided
for the rest of JAMES is very nice. It would be awesome if mailets had
access to the set of loggers that's defined in the main JAMES log
configuration...
Tom
On 1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christian Jense
I think that programatically sending a copy of the message to
"not.spam" would be the best way to accomplish this task. This is
because it would allow the internals of JAMES (or the bayesian filter)
to change dramatically with no impact to your software. Just think of
it as a black-box API.
Of co
Hi Sandeep,
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding deployment of
that mailet. It's not very well documented, but it does implement most
of the DK spec.
Tom
On 5/17/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
you can find a mailet by Tom Brown
promising to me...
Tom Brown
On Nov 25, 2007 9:21 AM, David Legg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past I've reported how effective I've found the Bayesian analysis
> filter supplied with James.
>
> I still find it incredibly effective (roughly 97% of all spam is
A pattern I've used successfully in the past to access global
resources is to make everything extend from a base class that has
access to the resources. If I declare the resources to be static, the
first class to be loaded will automatically initialize the resource.
Here's an example (since my desc
Ajay,
Of course, given the number of people who have asked for this over the
years, if you add this feature (or simplify this procedure) and
contribute it back to the project, it would be greatly appreciated.
Tom Brown
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DK_selector
hash_type_to_sign_with
comma,separated,list,of,headers,that,should,be,signed
Is this what you are looking for?
Tom Brown
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Mark Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone uses Tom Brown's Domain Keys mailet. If so,
> do
n the configuration so as to verify incoming mail. I'm sorry I
can't be more specific about this.
The DomainKeysVerifier accepts one optional parameter: "dns-server"
which can be used to explicitly set the DNS server that will be used
for looking up the DomainKeys DNS entries.
I hope thi
imple turn-key solution is not available, but in the
interest of stopping SPAM on the internet, I'll be happy to help you
get this up and running. Please ask any more questions as they arise.
Tom Brown
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Jerry M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom,
>
&g
18 matches
Mail list logo
