Changeset: 8970128e040d
Author:uta
Date: 2012-11-26 15:54 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8970128e040d
7162111: TEST_BUG: change tests run in headless mode [macosx] (open)
Summary: In problem tests detection of AWT headless mode was introduced or AWT
Changeset: ee6e5b7d5d55
Author:uta
Date: 2012-11-23 13:07 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ee6e5b7d5d55
8003898: X11 toolkit can be chosen as the default toolkit
Summary: XToolkit is not selected for any values of system-wide environment
variables (ex.
Have a couple of reviews but still need official reviewer to pass muster.
thanks,
bill
On 11/22/2012 7:51 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Bill,
Looks good for me.
-Dmitry
On 2012-11-21 23:31, BILL PITTORE wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On 11/21/2012 4:56 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Bill,
Few nits:
Looks good.
However, it'd be nice to fix the indentation commented by David (use
frames to notice it):
*vmStructs_cms.hpp*:
68declare_type(AFLBinaryTreeDictionary,
FreeBlockDictionaryFreeChunk)
*jni.cpp:*
2110declare_type(MetablockTreeDictionary,
Serguei,
I'm confused. When I look at the latest webrev
(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/8003879/webrev.02/) I believe the
indentation is correct - correct being defined as aligned on the first
letter of the type name. Please clarify what you expect if you do not agree.
Thanks,
Mikael
Mikael,
Sorry for the confusion. I see what you mean.
I missed that you made it consistent with the current style in these files.
Agree, that is the best you can do.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 11/26/12 2:37 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Serguei,
I'm confused. When I look at the latest webrev
Changeset: c2e80176a697
Author:mduigou
Date: 2012-11-26 15:08 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c2e80176a697
8001634: Initial set of functional interface types
Summary: Add the core functional interfaces used by the JSR335 libraries.
Reviewed-by: dholmes,
No worries, thanks for clarifying and for the review(s)!
Cheers,
Mikael
On 11/26/2012 3:00 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Mikael,
Sorry for the confusion. I see what you mean.
I missed that you made it consistent with the current style in these
files.
Agree, that is the best you can
Hi Bill,
A few minor comments, some of which you've touched on with Dmitry.
David
--
share/back/debugInit.c
40 #include sys.h
Shouldn't that be sys.h ?
---
src/share/back/transport.c
* Note: Java property sun.boot.library.path contains a single
directory.
+ * Note: