Re: RFR, fix for 8027914, compact1/2 VM exits silently with -Dcom.sun.management argument

2013-11-11 Thread bill pittore
Modified change based on feedback. New webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/8027914/webrev.01/ thanks, bill On 11/10/2013 1:57 PM, Bill Pittore wrote: I think that's a good idea since we now have the distinct possibility of the class not being available in certain profiles. I&

Re: RFR, fix for 8027914, compact1/2 VM exits silently with -Dcom.sun.management argument

2013-11-10 Thread Bill Pittore
I think that's a good idea since we now have the distinct possibility of the class not being available in certain profiles. I'll re-do the change and send out a new webrev. thanks, bill On 11/8/2013 9:45 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: On 11/8/2013 8:08 AM, bill.pitt...@oracle.com wrote: If you are r

RFR, fix for 8027914, compact1/2 VM exits silently with -Dcom.sun.management argument

2013-11-08 Thread bill . pittore
If you are running a non-minimal VM build with compact 1 or 2 JRE and you pass in -Dcom.sun.management argument, VM will exit silently with exit code 1. Fix adds an error check when attempting to load the class sun.management.Agent (missing from compact 1 and 2) and will print a message before

Re: Fwd: Re: RFR - 8023580 - Add jtreg test for 8004051 and 8005722

2013-08-28 Thread BILL PITTORE
8004051 and 8005722 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:38:28 -0700 From: Vladimir Kozlov To: hotspot compiler Looks good. Redirected to compiler alias since it is C1 compiler test. Vladimir On 8/22/13 11:06 AM, BILL PITTORE wrote: Would like a review of the following test being added to hotspot/test

Re: RFR - 8023580 - Add jtreg test for 8004051 and 8005722

2013-08-28 Thread BILL PITTORE
Added serviceability. bill On 8/22/2013 2:06 PM, BILL PITTORE wrote: Would like a review of the following test being added to hotspot/test/compiler that tests an assertion failure for both 8004051 and 8005722. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/8023580/webrev.00/ thanks, bill

Re: RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-08-19 Thread BILL PITTORE
te wrote: Serguei, Are you ok with the webrev at this point or are you waiting for any changes from Bill? I've asked Coleen to review the code since she's an official Reviewer but she'd like to make sure the serviceability team is ok with the changes. Bob. On Aug 3, 2013, at 12

Re: RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-08-02 Thread Bill Pittore
On 8/2/2013 9:12 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Bill, A couple of more questions. webrev.01/jvmti.html An agent L whose image has been combined with the VM *is defined* as /statically linked/ if and only if the agent exports a function called Agent_OnLoad_L. A question to the abov

Re: RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-07-30 Thread bill . pittore
Thanks Serguei for the comments. Some comments inline. I updated the webrevs at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/8014135/jdk/webrev.02/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/8014135/hotspot/webrev.01/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/8014135/javadoc/index.html http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~

Re: RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-07-25 Thread bill . pittore
Still need an official reviewer for the hotspot changes for statically linked agents. thanks, bill These changes address bug 8014135 which adds support for statically linked agents in the VM. This is a followup to the recent JNI spec changes that addressed statically linked JNI libraries( 800

Re: RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-07-16 Thread bill . pittore
, bill On 7/4/2013 12:41 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/07/2013 22:17, BILL PITTORE wrote: These changes address bug 8014135 which adds support for statically linked agents in the VM. This is a followup to the recent JNI spec changes that addressed statically linked JNI libraries( 8005716). The

Re: RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-07-10 Thread BILL PITTORE
p when he's back. bill On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:17 PM, BILL PITTORE <mailto:bill.pitt...@oracle.com>> wrote: These changes address bug 8014135 which adds support for statically linked agents in the VM. This is a followup to the recent JNI spec changes that addressed

Re: RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-07-08 Thread BILL PITTORE
On 7/4/2013 12:41 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 03/07/2013 22:17, BILL PITTORE wrote: These changes address bug 8014135 which adds support for statically linked agents in the VM. This is a followup to the recent JNI spec changes that addressed statically linked JNI libraries( 8005716). The JEP

RFR - Changes to address CCC 8014135: Support for statically linked agents

2013-07-03 Thread BILL PITTORE
These changes address bug 8014135 which adds support for statically linked agents in the VM. This is a followup to the recent JNI spec changes that addressed statically linked JNI libraries( 8005716). The JEP for this change is the same JEP as the JNI changes: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/178 W

Re: Fix for 8014669, build flags issue

2013-05-15 Thread BILL PITTORE
I'm fine with these changes. I can commit if someone can do the push if you think we need to get this in tonight. bill On 5/15/2013 8:43 PM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Bill, On 16/05/2013 10:05 AM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Bill, (re-fixed the build-dev alias) On 16/05/2013 6:48 AM, BILL PI

Re: Fix for 8014669, build flags issue

2013-05-15 Thread BILL PITTORE
On 5/15/2013 8:05 PM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Bill, (re-fixed the build-dev alias) On 16/05/2013 6:48 AM, BILL PITTORE wrote: Some architecture dependent flags do not make it through to the libjsig.so and libsaproc.so makefiles. As a result, the libs are not compiled/linked with the correct

Re: Official reviewer needed: Review request for fix for 7200297: agent code does not handle multiple dll_dir paths correctly

2012-11-27 Thread BILL PITTORE
emo/jvmti/hprof/hprof_md.c Fixed. --- src/windows/back/linker_md.c 123 return; Ditto previous comments. Fixed. Updated webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/7200297/webrev.04/ Running nsk tests. bill --- On 27/11/2012 3:45 AM, BILL PITTORE wrote: Have a couple of reviews

Official reviewer needed: Review request for fix for 7200297: agent code does not handle multiple dll_dir paths correctly

2012-11-26 Thread BILL PITTORE
Have a couple of reviews but still need official reviewer to pass muster. thanks, bill On 11/22/2012 7:51 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: Bill, Looks good for me. -Dmitry On 2012-11-21 23:31, BILL PITTORE wrote: Hi Dmitry, On 11/21/2012 4:56 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: Bill, Few nits: 1

Re: Review request for fix for 7200297

2012-11-21 Thread BILL PITTORE
I think in terms of code readability I like the 'else' since it makes it clear to the reader that there are two different cases. C compiler will 'do the right thing'. Updated the webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/7200297/webrev.03/ thanks, bill Otherwise looks good

Re: Review request for fix for 7200297

2012-11-19 Thread BILL PITTORE
Have gotten reviews from Serguei Spitsyn for the changes, made some improvements and need an official reviewer to check it out. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/7200297/webrev.02 thanks, bill On 11/14/2012 5:27 PM, bill.pitt...@oracle.com wrote: This bug has to do with the jdwp and hprof

Re: Review request for fix for 7200297

2012-11-16 Thread BILL PITTORE
Thank you for fixing it! Ok, will do. thanks, bill Thanks, Serguei On 11/15/12 11:27 AM, BILL PITTORE wrote: Hi Serguei, Thanks for the review and your excellent suggestion at some simplification in dll_build_name. Applied the changes, built, test and all is still working. New webrev

Re: Review request for fix for 7200297

2012-11-15 Thread BILL PITTORE
Hi Serguei, Thanks for the review and your excellent suggestion at some simplification in dll_build_name. Applied the changes, built, test and all is still working. New webrev at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/7200297/webrev.01/ Are you an official reviewer? thanks, bill On 11/15/20

Review request for fix for 7200297

2012-11-14 Thread bill . pittore
This bug has to do with the jdwp and hprof agents not parsing the sun.boot.library.path (dll_dir) correctly since the fix for 6819213 went in some years ago. This bug popped up while working on a particular platform that does not have the ability to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH before running the VM. As

Re: RFR: 8002034 and 8001756 - FDS changes mainly re cross-compiling

2012-11-05 Thread BILL PITTORE
only affect the linux defs.make. Thanks, David On 2/11/2012 12:39 PM, David Holmes wrote: On 2/11/2012 12:03 PM, BILL PITTORE wrote: On 11/1/2012 7:47 PM, David Holmes wrote: On 2/11/2012 8:49 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: David, Sorry, (my eyes) I misread if As far as I understand,

Re: RFR: 8002034 and 8001756 - FDS changes mainly re cross-compiling

2012-11-01 Thread BILL PITTORE
On 11/1/2012 7:47 PM, David Holmes wrote: On 2/11/2012 8:49 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: David, Sorry, (my eyes) I misread if As far as I understand, cross compilation require explicit ALT_OBJCOPY. Yes. Is there any defaults? No. The makefiles know nothing about the toolsets for cross-c

Re: Code review for SA changes to allow for new processor architectures (7154641)

2012-08-22 Thread BILL PITTORE
weird indentation Fixed. bill Thanks, /Staffan On 21 aug 2012, at 23:47, BILL PITTORE wrote: These changes allow for the (easier) addition of new processor types to SA other than the standard x86, amd64 and sparc. By using reflection, it is not necessary to instantiate the new class dire

Code review for SA changes to allow for new processor architectures (7154641)

2012-08-21 Thread BILL PITTORE
These changes allow for the (easier) addition of new processor types to SA other than the standard x86, amd64 and sparc. By using reflection, it is not necessary to instantiate the new class directly in the existing code. Rather the class name is derived from the cpu/os name and is loaded and t

Re: Webrev for 6972759

2012-01-12 Thread Bill Pittore
nt? I remember it should not be there. --Yumin On 1/12/2012 12:24 PM, Bill Pittore wrote: Hi David, Thanks for forwarding this to the SA list. I did run the nsk/jvmti tests from the UTE area on sqenfs-1.us.oracle.com. There were no new failures with this change. bill On 1/12/2012 2:54 AM,

Re: Webrev for 6972759

2012-01-12 Thread Bill Pittore
David On 11/01/2012 8:40 AM, Bill Pittore wrote: Webrev for fix for 6972759 is at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpittore/6972759/webrev.00/ This bug has to do with single stepping after hitting an exception breakpoint. The short story is that JVMTI maintains some thread state information that wa