On 17/04/2018 4:36 AM, Robert Field wrote:
Rather than reverse engineer the spec from the hotspot implementation...
Capabilities are the mechanism by which the level of functionality is
defined. Capabilities say what can be done, not what can't.
The wording "The redefinition must not add, re
Added to the JDK-8192936.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/16/18 11:36, Robert Field wrote:
Rather than reverse engineer the spec from the hotspot implementation...
Capabilities are the mechanism by which the level of functionality is
defined. Capabilities say what can be done, not what can't.
The wo
Added this and prev. suggestion to the JDK-8192936.
Thansk,
Serguei
On 4/16/18 11:36, Robert Field wrote:
Rather than reverse engineer the spec from the hotspot implementation...
Capabilities are the mechanism by which the level of functionality is
defined. Capabilities say what can be done
Rather than reverse engineer the spec from the hotspot implementation...
Capabilities are the mechanism by which the level of functionality is
defined. Capabilities say what can be done, not what can't.
The wording "The redefinition must not add, remove or rename fields or
methods, change th
On 2/21/18 16:59, David Holmes wrote:
On 22/02/2018 7:44 AM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Karen,
Thank you for sorting this out!
On 2/21/18 09:55, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Dan,
Thank you for all the background digging. This is really helpful.
Serguei - do you know what tests exist for
Correction ...
On 22/02/2018 10:59 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 22/02/2018 7:44 AM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Karen,
Thank you for sorting this out!
On 2/21/18 09:55, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Dan,
Thank you for all the background digging. This is really helpful.
Serguei - do you know
Karen,
On 2/21/18 16:46, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Sergeui,
You were right - I read the sources incorrectly.
This code is easy to misunderstand - I read it incorrectly multiple
times. :)
This parts causes mos
On 22/02/2018 7:44 AM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Karen,
Thank you for sorting this out!
On 2/21/18 09:55, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Dan,
Thank you for all the background digging. This is really helpful.
Serguei - do you know what tests exist for this behavior?
Dan already replied (t
Sergeui,
You were right - I read the sources incorrectly. Would still help to understand
both
the motivation and the reason to not add to the spec.
Robert - do you remember why we didn’t add this to the specification? (6404550)
> On Feb 21, 2018, at 4:44 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
>
Hi Karen,
Thank you for sorting this out!
On 2/21/18 09:55, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Dan,
Thank you for all the background digging. This is
really helpful.
Serguei - do you know what tests
Hi Dan,
On 2/21/18 10:02, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 2/21/18 12:55 PM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Dan,
Thank you for all the background digging. This is
really helpful.
Serguei - do you
On 2/21/18 12:55 PM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Dan,
Thank you for all the background digging. This is really helpful.
Serguei - do you know what tests exist for this behavior?
I mentioned a test that I found in the email that I attached to my
previous reply:
Subject:
Re: adding/deleting methods
Dan,
Thank you for all the background digging. This is really helpful.
Serguei - do you know what tests exist for this behavior?
The way I read the source code - we currently allow ADD and DELETE for
PRIVATE OR STATIC OR FINAL methods. Did I read that correctly?
With the current implementation,
On 2/21/18 2:45 AM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2/20/18 23:01, David Holmes wrote:
On 21/02/2018 4:50 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Karen and David,
On 2/20/18 19:52, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Karen,
On 21/02/2018 1:54 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Folks,
As part of the Valhal
On 2/20/18 23:01, David Holmes wrote:
On 21/02/2018 4:50 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Karen and David,
On 2/20/18 19:52, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Karen,
On 21/02/2018 1:54 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Folks,
As part of the Valhalla EG discussions for JVMTI changes for
nestmates (tha
On 21/02/2018 4:50 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Karen and David,
On 2/20/18 19:52, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Karen,
On 21/02/2018 1:54 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Folks,
As part of the Valhalla EG discussions for JVMTI changes for
nestmates (thank you Serguei and David),
IBM brought
Hi Karen and David,
On 2/20/18 19:52, David Holmes wrote:
Hi
Karen,
On 21/02/2018 1:54 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Folks,
As part of the Valhalla EG discussions for JVMTI changes for
nestma
Hi Karen,
On 21/02/2018 1:54 AM, Karen Kinnear wrote:
Folks,
As part of the Valhalla EG discussions for JVMTI changes for nestmates (thank
you Serguei and David),
IBM brought up a request that we update the JVMTI documentation to reflect that
we allow addition
of private methods.
Is there a
Folks,
As part of the Valhalla EG discussions for JVMTI changes for nestmates (thank
you Serguei and David),
IBM brought up a request that we update the JVMTI documentation to reflect that
we allow addition
of private methods.
Is there a reason we do not document this? I’m inviting those who we
19 matches
Mail list logo
