Looks good!
/R
On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> Can I have a second review for the Hotspot part of this change?
>
> Thanks,
> /Staffan
>
> On 27 aug 2013, at 10:48, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>
>> I have also made a fix for hotspot. I messed up the link in the last email
>>
Can I have a second review for the Hotspot part of this change?
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 27 aug 2013, at 10:48, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> I have also made a fix for hotspot. I messed up the link in the last email so
> here are both webrevs.
>
> jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8023786/webrev.00/
On 27 aug 2013, at 13:38, David Holmes wrote:
> On 27/08/2013 6:48 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>> I have also made a fix for hotspot. I messed up the link in the last email
>> so here are both webrevs.
>>
>> jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8023786/webrev.00/
>
> Seems okay.
>
>> hotspot:
Thanks!
On 27 aug 2013, at 13:45, David Holmes wrote:
> On 27/08/2013 9:41 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>
>> On 27 aug 2013, at 13:38, David Holmes wrote:
>>
>>> On 27/08/2013 6:48 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I have also made a fix for hotspot. I messed up the link in the last email
so
On 27/08/2013 9:41 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 27 aug 2013, at 13:38, David Holmes wrote:
On 27/08/2013 6:48 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I have also made a fix for hotspot. I messed up the link in the last email so
here are both webrevs.
jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8023786/webrev.0
On 27/08/2013 6:48 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I have also made a fix for hotspot. I messed up the link in the last email so
here are both webrevs.
jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8023786/webrev.00/
Seems okay.
hotspot: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8023720/webrev.00/
??? You didn't
I have also made a fix for hotspot. I messed up the link in the last email so
here are both webrevs.
jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8023786/webrev.00/
hotspot: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8023720/webrev.00/
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 27 aug 2013, at 10:41, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> The orig
The original conversation about this problem is here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2013-August/011318.html
In short, setjmp/longjmp on OS X messes up the signal mask and we should use
_setjmp/_longjmp instead.
This change fixes two occurences in the jdk. There ar
