On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:58:26 GMT, Fairoz Matte wrote:
>> findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
>> get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
>> list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
>> We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
>> vm.classesByNa
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:58:26 GMT, Fairoz Matte wrote:
>> findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
>> get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
>> list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
>> We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
>> vm.classesByNa
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:58:26 GMT, Fairoz Matte wrote:
>> findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
>> get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
>> list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
>> We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
>> vm.classesByNa
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 07:58:26 GMT, Fairoz Matte wrote:
>> findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
>> get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
>> list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
>> We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
>> vm.classesByNa
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:31:35 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this,
>>
>>>Do we even need findComponentType() any more? Isn't
>>>ReferenceTypeImpl.findType() sufficient.
>>
>> We still need findComponentType(),
>> Difference between findType() and findCo
> findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
> get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
> list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
> We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
> vm.classesByName("") is expecting the fully qualified name example
> "java
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:57:03 GMT, Fairoz Matte wrote:
> > Do we even need findComponentType() any more? Isn't
> > ReferenceTypeImpl.findType() sufficient.
>
> We still need findComponentType(),
> Difference between findType() and findComponentType() is that,
> findComponentType() tries to get
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 23:47:26 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
>> get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
>> list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
>> We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
>> vm.classesByN
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:03:42 GMT, Fairoz Matte wrote:
> findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
> get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
> list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
> We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
> vm.classesByName(""
findComponentType() logic is wrong. In findComponentType() method, We always
get vm.classesByName() retruns empty list
list = vm.classesByName(parser.typeName());
We have "parser.typeName()" retruns " double[][]"
vm.classesByName("") is expecting the fully qualified name example
"java.lang.Double
10 matches
Mail list logo