Yes you are crazy.
I have to agree - dependency hell is not something I'd like to have to
overcome. Eclipse's deal is a nice example.
Kit
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2007, at 4:31 PM, "Bruce Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I
Im using the pax-logging stuff on a project. Very nice.
Kit
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:28 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw, the pax project has lots of interesting things.
See http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/display/ops4j/Pax+RadMan and
much more.
On 10/3/07, Guillaume Node
Me too. I think.
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
ot;F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
>
Here here.
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
org/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
>
I've used MagicDraw on OS X. It's pretty terrible...but does work for
sequence diagrams. I'm not sure if they have a "free" version or not.
Doesn't OmniGraffle do some UML stuff too?
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
I'd be up for a few chat sessions!
On 8/23/07, Nodet Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Btw, if there is sufficient interest, we could organize irc meetings
> to discuss these topics and post the log to the dev list for archiving
> and later discussion.
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> On A
e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Kit,
>
> I'm quite sure you would have a very valuable input there, given your
> experience
> on ServiceMix. So I'm starting this new thread. Would you mind
> throwing a few
> ideas there ?
>
> Cheers,
> Guillau
On 8/22/07, Terry Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Interesting.
>
> We need to have a very serious chat about application lifecycles and
> governance...
>
> Terry
>
And Federating...distribution of the NMR across n-platforms!
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-
TED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
>
I've got a simple screencast of these ops. It may be a bit old...a
Ehttp://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
As long as I can "comment out" the feature at one place I don't mind the
styleguide stuff. But, you are right...seems like it would be more of
On 7/3/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we go that way, how could we deal with the examples ?
I guess they would either require the use to download the components,
or be available on a separate distros (and thus have their own
release cycle too).
On 7/2/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMA
Sounds good. If you already have something set up...that's fine with me.
Kit
Brian O'Neill wrote:
All,
OK. So I officially started a new service engine. Guillaume, I
figured I would use servicemix-bean as a template. Does that make
sense to you?
Jean-Sebastien, thanks for the pointers. I
kitplummer (im)Agreed...and I believe based on my limited knowledge of
Tuscany that updating the TuscanyRuntime to be able to deploy a SCA POJO
should be straight forward - and simpler with the EmbeddedSCADomain.
I also agree on the tooling to provide the mapping between an SCA
Composite to
the component is presently using:
20060317
Jean-Sebastien, can you recommend a stable branch to move to?
Guillaume, any suggestions?
-brian
Kit Plummer wrote:
> Hey guys.
>
> Here's the direct link to the use case that Brian referenced:
>
> http://www.jbizint.org/wiki/index.
eting you.
Yes. I/we was/were thinking exactly along those lines. In fact, I have
a nearly identical example / write-up here:
http://www.jbizint.org/wiki/index.php?title=SCA_Service_Engine
I appreciate all the input. Kit Plummer and I are trying to resurrect
the engine and build on what Guill
I believe it is probably necessary for whatever the relationship is - to
accommodate the SCA composite as is. It should not be necessary to
modify anything in the SCA app to deploy against SM. Are you guys
thinking the same thing? Guillaume, is that what you are implying by
the "transform" i
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kit Plummer updated SM-976:
---
Attachment: checkstyle_fixes_servicemix-sca.diff
This diff covers all of the CheckStyle and PMD errors
Components: servicemix-sca
Reporter: Kit Plummer
The current state of the servicemix-sca codebase requires turning off the
CheckStyle plugin in SMX/parent/pom.xml and installing it into the Maven repo.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to
I've made all the fixes (to accommodate CheckStyle and PMD). Is a
project-level patch the best way to handle all of the affected files?
Kit
----
Kit Plummer
Advanced Programs
Raytheon Mission Systems
520.360.4729 (cell)
520.545.9346 (desk)
kitplummer (im)
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/22/07
A simple first step might be to get everything past CheckStyle and
PMD...so it doesn't take a "non-normal" SM config/install/deploy.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Copying tuscany dev list ...
On 6/22/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/22/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37900
]
Kit Plummer commented on SM-761:
Not sure if it is really related to this particular thread of discussion, but I
can
21 matches
Mail list logo
