cc:
> Sent by: "A mailing Subject: Re:
> WebMacro versus Pajes Servlet
> list for discussion Framework
> about Sun
> Microsystem's Java
>
Peter Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M> cc:
Sent by: "A mailing Subject: Re: WebMacro versus Pajes
Servlet
list for
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Milt
> Epstein
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 1:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WebMacro versus Pajes Servlet Framework
>
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Tom K wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply Richard,
> >
> > I
s the focus."
Very interesting read,
T. Kochanowicz
-Original Message-
From: A mailing list for discussion about Sun Microsystem's Java Servlet
API Technology. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Milt
Epstein
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
rs to for more
detailed discussion of the different frameworks.
> -Original Message-
> From: A mailing list for discussion about Sun Microsystem's Java Servlet
> API Technology. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Richard Yee
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:36
Another mature product in this category is JOT Servlets.
http://www.jotobjects.com
Paul Copeland, JOT Object Technologies
Date:Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:48:05 -0500
From:Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WebMacro versus Pajes Servlet Framework
This is a multi-part message i
rvlet API Technology.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Yee
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:36
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WebMacro versus Pajes
Servlet Framework
Have you looked at Struts? http://jakarta.apache.org/struts
-Richard
At 09:48 AM 6/13/2003 -0500, you
Have you looked at Struts?
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts
-Richard
At 09:48 AM 6/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I am
looking for a presentation framework to use with my servlets. Has anyone
tried WebMacro or Pajes Servlet Frameworks? Any suggestions,
success/failure stories out there? I am leaning
I am looking for a presentation
framework to use with my servlets. Has anyone tried WebMacro or Pajes Servlet Frameworks? Any suggestions, success/failure
stories out there? I am leaning toward Pajes but have
not seen nearly as many write-ups about Pajes versus WebMacro.
TK
To my mind, jsp just doesn't solve my problems at the right level. This is especially
true where interfaces to databases are concerned. We've been using xsql (which is an
oracle product) for a couple of years now, and in most cases we can get a good degree
of separation between the database/bus
hi, doing some research on servlets. reading jason hunter's 2nd edition.
familiar with webmacro and freemarker. i can see the merits of the others,
but it seems strange that there are so many alternatives to jsp. jsp with
tags, (java) beans, forward, redirect, include ... would seem lik
I just installed Webmacro and ran the examples, and this is what I below is
what I got in the tomcat window.
I got the classpath right, and the webmacro.properties file is found, as
well as the templates.
All works fine in the browser, but it seems like there is something wrong...
Any ideas ? Is
-- Forwarded Message
> From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:31:48 -0800
> Subject: Re: Anybody tried WebMacro for HTML Template ???
>
> Hi.
>
> <http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/differences.html>
>
> The code is very stable
Gene Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you mean comparable with WebMacro, or compatible?
>
> Anyway, it looks like Velocity is not yet released. Might not be the best
> time to use it for a business app?
>
> Interestingly enough, I thought the WebMacro guys were
Do you mean comparable with WebMacro, or compatible?
Anyway, it looks like Velocity is not yet released. Might not be the best
time to use it for a business app?
Interestingly enough, I thought the WebMacro guys were pushing to get
Apache to bundle it into their products. I can't be
Gene Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Incidently, don't give up. WebMacro rocks. It's seriously the web's
> missing link!
Whops :) Empty message went out :) I wanted to say that you might be
interested in checking out Velocity too, it's supposed to
Gene Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Incidently, don't give up. WebMacro rocks. It's seriously the web's
> missing link!
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli - Sun Microsystems I
different servlet engine.
Incidently, don't give up. WebMacro rocks. It's seriously the web's
missing link!
- gene
>I tried Webmacro as a html template engine with Weblogic 5.1 but it gives me
>some errors. I tried their example but I get an error of
>"class org/webmacro/W
I tried Webmacro as a html template engine with Weblogic 5.1 but it gives me
some errors. I tried their example but I get an error of
"class org/webmacro/WebMacro not found".
I had put webmacro.jar in the system's classpath. Also, in the to
set the weblogic classpath for th
Quoting Peter Pilgrim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi
>
> I am taking a look at webmacro now. The examples `HelloWorld' and `GuestBook' appear
> to be working, but I am getting a backtrace in `/logs/error_log'
>
> I cant explain this backtrace.
>
>
> *** BEGIN: 11/
A mailing list for discussion about Sun Microsystem's Java
Servlet API Technology."@java.sun.com>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: My webmacro examples are working but cant explain backtrace
Hi
I am taking a look at webmacro now. The examples `HelloWorld' and `GuestBook'
Hi
I am taking a look at webmacro now. The examples `HelloWorld' and `GuestBook' appear
to be working, but I am getting a backtrace in `/logs/error_log'
I cant explain this backtrace.
*** BEGIN: 11/22/00 12:19 PM ***
*** LOG LEVEL SET TO: EXCEPTION
11/22/00 12:19 PM
Another framework to consider is JOT Servlets, a general purpose tool
for dynamic web page generation which combines a template page parser
with an efficient server-side Beans framework.
http://www.jotobjects.com
-- Paul Copeland, JOT Object Technologies
Status Distribution November 18, 2000 20:38:44
The message regarding "Re: Which is the best framework WebMacro, Struts, or
Tapestr" sent on November 18, 2000 20:38:44 was sent by
Status Recipient
TypeTo
Native Name [EMAIL
(Sorry for the late response, my first posting bounced. I have way too
many email addresses.)
robert young wrote:
>
> just out of curiosity, and since neither the O'reilly site,
> nor his has any specific information, and he's voiced some
> strong approval of WebMacro in t
Quoting Peter Pilgrim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I appreciate WebMacro
> predates JSP and we will review the frameworks by trying them out.
Correction on this: WebMacro does not predate JSP as a whole, it only
predates the current incarnation of JSP, and any notion of JSP having
a mode
don't want to be programmers script pages. I plan on
using Tea for my new Servlets.com site.
* WebMacro (webmacro.org) works well for creating "web applications"
where templates aren't created as often so you're willing to trade some
page protection in exchange for some
I hope Jason does into the philosophies in detail. Mind you there is JSP book
coming out from O'Reilly, any one seen that book and whether it discuss the issue
of frameworks and MVC in general.
I pass my spec / proposal to the other guys in my team. I appreciate WebMacro
predates JSP and we
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, robert young wrote:
> just out of curiosity, and since neither the O'reilly site,
> nor his has any specific information, and he's voiced some
> strong approval of WebMacro in the past; any notion of
> when Jason Hunter's 2nd edtion will be
nt :-).
JSP, because it includes custom tags, can easily *support* the same separation of
concerns that template environments like WebMacro and Velocity provide. The
philosophical difference that Justin and others articulate is whether the developer
should be *restricted* to only that approach.
just out of curiosity, and since neither the O'reilly site,
nor his has any specific information, and he's voiced some
strong approval of WebMacro in the past; any notion of
when Jason Hunter's 2nd edtion will be available and whether
it provides new treatments of WebMacro (and o
than that provided by the template solutions, so you wind up
being encouraged to do the wrong thing.
Most of the template solutions allow you a much cleaner separation of
concerns than is possible in JSP.
WebMacro in particular expects you to develop all of your program
logic in back end JavaBeans, inde
Pete:
As suggested earlier, perhaps have a look at Expresso at
www.javacorporate.com. It's definitely *not* anti-jsp, quite the opposite,
it provides many tools for using JSP (or Webmacro, or XML/XSL, etc).
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: A mailing list for discussio
--- Message History
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/11/2000 11:35
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Which is the best framework WebMacro, Struts, or Tapestry?
Hi
Has anyone carried out a survey , r
Quoting vsr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If you intend to go ahead with just one of the
> frameworks you mentioned, I suggest WebMacro. By the
> way WebMacro does not work with JSP but it is a
> replacement to JSP.
You could make WebMacro work with JSP but I'm not sure why you would
> Has anyone carried out a survey , review, or detailed examination of
> these frameworks?
>
> 1) WebMacro
> 2) Jakarta Struts
> 3) Tapestry
>
I had similar questions about a year ago. After creating a persistence and
presentation framework for a project, I
Hi,
I have been using WebMacro for an year now and also
looked at the Jakarta Struts. Tapestry is new to me.
All that I can say is you might want to have a look at
another wonderfull framework called Turbine of Apache
Software Foundation which is an integration of many
WebMacro like frameworks
Hi
Has anyone carried out a survey , review, or detailed examination of
these frameworks?
1) WebMacro
2) Jakarta Struts
3) Tapestry
I am interested if they work with Java Server Pages
Are they any other that I have missed?
--
Peter Pilgrim
G.O.A.T
&quo
WebMacro 0.94 was released today:
http://webmacro.org/Download.html
WebMacro's creation several years ago put Model/View/Controller
servlet programming in the limelight. Now there's a new stable
release of WebMacro with some significant improvements.
The idea behind WebMac
I've posted a new snapshot of WebMacro to the website.
http://webmacro.org/Download.html
This version is available under the Apache license as well as the GPL.
NOTE: There is a big change if you are using this in standalone mode.
You have to invoke WebMacro with an object cal
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 01:35:44AM -0800, Tim Panton - Westhawk Ltd wrote:
[snip]
> I'd like to use a template system,
> where the users configure a sample
> report, and the application reads
> the template, substitutes real values
> and spits out a report.
>
> Has anyone done this ? Are the
> tem
Quoting Dave Glowacki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> These number obviously aren't exact, but they sure seem to indicate
> that FreeMarker pretty consistently takes roughly 2/3rds of the time
> needed by WebMacro (I'd love to know what's up with the SmallPage stuff
> on 1.3beta
Justin Wells wrote:
> Quoting Dave Glowacki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I then did some benchmarking and found that FreeMarker is
> > at a minimum 5 times faster than WebMacro for their common
> > operations. This seems to be due to all the introspection
> > that WebMacr
eport, and the application reads the template, substitutes real values
> and spits out a report.
>
> Has anyone done this ? Are the template systems tied to a servlet engine?
In the 0.89.1 release you can do this with WebMacro like this:
Template t = new FileTemplate("something.wm&
At 01:35 AM 1/29/00 -0800, Tim Panton - Westhawk Ltd wrote:
>I need to produce report files from
>a swing app- so there is no web
>server in the picture.
>
>We want the reports to be in
>HTML.
>
>I'd like to use a template system,
>where the users configure a sample
>report, and the application re
I need to produce report files from
a swing app- so there is no web
server in the picture.
We want the reports to be in
HTML.
I'd like to use a template system,
where the users configure a sample
report, and the application reads
the template, substitutes real values
and spits out a report.
Has
Quoting Robert Crawford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 09:32:08AM -0600, Dave Glowacki wrote:
> > I then did some benchmarking and found that FreeMarker is
> > at a minimum 5 times faster than WebMacro for their common
> > operations. This seems to be due to
Quoting Dave Glowacki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I then did some benchmarking and found that FreeMarker is
> at a minimum 5 times faster than WebMacro for their common
> operations. This seems to be due to all the introspection
> that WebMacro must perform.
I doubt it's the int
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 09:32:08AM -0600, Dave Glowacki wrote:
> I then did some benchmarking and found that FreeMarker is
> at a minimum 5 times faster than WebMacro for their common
> operations. This seems to be due to all the introspection
> that WebMacro must perform.
>>> Dave Glowacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26-Jan-00 3:32:08 PM >>>
>I then did some benchmarking and found that FreeMarker is
>at a minimum 5 times faster than WebMacro for their common
>operations. This seems to be due to all the introspection
>that Web
Jason Hunter wrote:
> Sure, I'm game. WebMacro isn't the only game in town.
I did an informal survey a couple of weeks ago and came up
with WebMacro and FreeMarker as the two most powerful
template engines around.
They both have roughly the same features, though WebMacro
supports
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 1999 6:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WebMacro versus FreeMarker
>
>
> Alex Smith wrote:
> > Jason Hunter does a fairly good job of introducing the readers to
> > the latter two technologies in his book but om
At 03:32 PM 6/3/99 -0700, you wrote:
>WebMacro and FreeMarker Users:
>
>I am in the process of deciding which template package to use in a
>project. ...
i looked at both and chose webmacro because of the ease of calling java
functions from the html. while freemarker looked a lit
se. Nothing stops you, the owner, from granting different
> rights to different people.
>
> I have chosen to grant the entire planet the right to use WebMacro
> under the terms of the GNU General Public License--for free. This
> GPL is just an ordinary license, and nothing stops me from
Freemarker and WebMacro. Caching a
> parsed template is a must for a template framework and both Freemarker and
> WebMacro do that. However, due to WebMacro's broker architecture, a provider
> has to be written whereas no extra effort is required by Freemarker.
>
> As an aside, I dont se
; Justin
>
> Be it WebMacro or FreeMarker, an average developer like me (trying to be
> modest :-) will surely find them quiet useful when developing dynamic web
> pages. I guess, the issue that is of concern of is the one that you left out
> (I'm not sure if that was intentional) i.
Quoting Cezar Totth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Also WebMacro allows you to use standard Java collections such
> > as Vector, List, Hashtable, or even just arrays, to store lists
> > of objects--other packages generally require you to use their
> > own special adapters.
>
ly under GPL conditions?
> Does the "shrink-wrapped" commercial product isnt affected by the GPL
> too, as long as it...existed first for WebMacro, no matter what
> other new licenses you want to give later.
As I understand it, the original developer -- only -- may
release the so
Quoting Alex Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> had problems with WebMacro's
> guestbook example due to the default template provider's functionality of
> looking for a template in the classpath.
This is actually not correct either. WebMacro looks for templates
under the Temp
A few people here have noted that WebMacro uses class analysis
(reflection/introspection) to extract properties from objects
in its template, whereas other systems force you to implement
an adapter class for every object you use.
The speculation is that as a result, WebMacro is slow.
The
For the sake of showing the list readers that my comments
were not entirely unaccurate:
Me:
---
1) Freemarker is template-only package whereas WebMacro tries to go beyond
that with the resource broker(s), template providers and other possibly nice
but unnecessary (in my case) stuff. I wanted
Hi Justin,
On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Justin Wells wrote:
> WebMacro doesn't require you to write adapters to access your
> data. You can take any object you like and, with no work beyond
..
>
> Also WebMacro allows you to use standard Java collections such
> as Vector,
On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Justin Wells wrote:
> Hi Alex, many of your comments about WebMacro were not accurate:
>
> This is misleading. WebMacro uses the reflection API to analyze your
> class exactly once for each class, and then caches that data for the
> life of your serv
Justin
Be it WebMacro or FreeMarker, an average developer like me (trying to be
modest :-) will surely find them quiet useful when developing dynamic web
pages. I guess, the issue that is of concern of is the one that you left out
(I'm not sure if that was intentional) i.e. the license. I&
WebMacro doesn't require you to write adapters to access your
data. You can take any object you like and, with no work beyond
context.put("fred", myCustomer)
access all the public data in myCustomer as $fred.Name,
$fred.Address, etc.
Other packages generally require you t
Hi Alex, many of your comments about WebMacro were not accurate:
Quoting Alex Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 1) Freemarker is template-only package whereas WebMacro tries to go beyond
> that with the resource broker(s), template providers and other possibly nice
> but unnecessary (i
Wow, they have a freemarker.org now, that's cool! I just went there and
found no requirement for a password. Try again.
-Original Message-
From: Hee Meng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 1999 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WebMacro versus FreeMarker
Alex Smith wrote:
>
> JSP I rejected right away as something very wrong. Not only the syntax was
> unappealing (to say the least) but the idea of mixing Java and HTML in the
> same page seemed like someone's Javascript-induced nightmare. To elaborate,
> my goal was to have an HTML designer and an
http://www.gemplus.com
Gemplus Software [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Séparateur Réponse
Objet : Re: WebMacro versus FreeMarker
Auteur : "A mailing list for discussion about Sun Microsystem's Java
S
From: Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, June 03, 1999 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: WebMacro versus FreeMarker
>Before starting a project (standard e-commerce stuff and multi-tier
>architecture), the only piece of the architecture I
't give any
> specifics about the peformance, but it certainly doesn't seem to be
> significantly slow. From what I've read about WebMacro, the basic
> features of the two packages are very similar (basic variable
> replacement; an "if" construct; list fill-ins, etc.). I
Alex Smith wrote:
> Jason Hunter does a fairly good job of introducing the readers to
> the latter two technologies in his book but omits the templates,
> and that's a shame, IMO, because templates are a correct way to go
> for anything but the most simple application. (They're not even
> mentione
various flavors and
"pure" templates (Webmacro, dexios.template aka Freemarker). Other
possibilities were generating HTML "by hand" from the servlet using either
"straight" (dumb) out.println("<...>") approach, generating HTML using a
library (WebLogic's
I have been happily using FreeMarker for a month or so and so far it
fits my needs just fine. I haven't stressed it, so I can't give any
specifics about the peformance, but it certainly doesn't seem to be
significantly slow. From what I've read about WebMacro, the basic
WebMacro and FreeMarker Users:
I am in the process of deciding which template package to use in a
project. It would be wonderful to hear from those that have used either
or both packages.
Throughout the time I have been subscribing to the list, many
suggestions have been made leading users to
WebMacro Servlet Framework
==
Announcing WebMacro 0.89.1:
http://www.webmacro.org/
WebMacro is a Java servlet development framework, including a
template engine plus extensible component model. It uses Java
introspection to make ordinary objects in your
WebMacro Servlet Framework
==
Announcing WebMacro 0.85.2:
http://www.webmacro.org/
WebMacro is a Java servlet development framework, including a
template engine plus extensible component model. It uses Java
introspection to make ordinary objects in your
as the "Ports Operating
> System" and it would be perfectly legal if all the source was freely
> available as required by the GPL (note that I would be required to
> extend the rights of the GPL to anyone who bought my distribution
> too). This is exactly what RedHat, SuSE, and
o). This is exactly what RedHat, SuSE, and Caldera do to make
money.
> 2. You may NOT put some additional wrapper around WebMacro and ***sell***
> it calling it your own. For this you must share some of your profits with
> Justin Wells. Reasonable enough, since he wrote it in the first
I think much of the misunderstandings here stem from misconceptions about
the terms of the GNU license.
My understanding might smooth some feathers and since I like the ideas
behind WebMacro, I am happy to contribute this bit towards its success.
1. You may use GNU software for commercial use
s much to do with WebMacro, but it is
> good exposure for the GPL, GNU project, Free Software Foundation,
> and so forth--WebMacro is under the GNU license.
>
> Quoting Inderjeet Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > I have a (stupid) question:
>
Well this thread no longer has much to do with WebMacro, but it is
good exposure for the GPL, GNU project, Free Software Foundation,
and so forth--WebMacro is under the GNU license.
Quoting Inderjeet Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi Justin,
>
> I have a (stupid) question:
>
> O
rereleased as GPL.
-- Glen
Inderjeet Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 23/04/99 09:29:18
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Glen Stampoultzis/ITD/MEL/Ansett/AU)
Subject: webmacro license
Justin Wells wrote:
> I am a big supporter of the FSF appr
Justin Wells wrote:
> I am a big supporter of the FSF approach, and one of those people
> who think ESR's approach is a retreat.
>
> If someone wants to use WebMacro outside the GPL--they can license
> it from me like a commercial product, in effect paying for the
> devel
Title: RE: webmacro
Scenario:
I'm planning on creating an HTML configuration and status interface to a commercial product that is not sold as a web server. If I use Webmacro to cut down on my development workload, then I need to ship Webmacro for runtime support with the product. Web
ase your software under the LGPL...
And release under GPL if you can. Only if your library duplicates
a non-free library should you go LGPL. Since WebMacro does something
no other package does, the correct license is GPL.
I am a big supporter of the FSF approach, and one of those people
who think
if I'm under contract to a government organization to develop an
> application that the government will own and take control of when I
> deliver it?
>
> Can I still use webmacro?
>
> -rob
>
> ___
&g
Not to beat a dead horse, but what about developing government owned
software?
What if I'm under contract to a government organization to develop an
application that the government will own and take control of when I
deliver it?
Can I still use webmacro?
Here is my final remark on this topic:
Justin, I offer to pay you $0.01 (US) in order to purchase webmacro from you
that is released under the LGPL. Take it or leave it. I'm tired of arguing
with you about your product.
> The FSF discourages new software from being placed under LGPL:
>
>http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html
No they don't. What is says is that you should take into consideration what
it means to release your software under the LGPL...
I quote:
> The choice of license makes a big dif
for distributing something you
created under GPL.
Once and for all: The GPL never requires you to do anything; only
restricts the way you distribute when or if YOU CHOOSE to do thay.
If someone can show me that there is any reason why WebMacro can't
be used to build commercial and corp
Quoting Robb Shecter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Justin Wells wrote:
>
> > You can use webMacro on a corporate or commercial or any other kind
> > of site. You can build applications based on WebMacro and transfer
> > copyright to them to someone else. In both cases you c
I also need more clarification - particularly - "You can build applications
based on WebMacro and transfer
copyright to them to someone else.".
I don't want to use software or libraries which require me to distribute
"my" source, binary or otherwise to others. I have no
>> If you modify the original LGPL'd code
>> however you have to distribute your changes.
>
>source or binary?
The source but not the source code to your whole app. Just the source to
the library (or whatever) that was LGPL'd.
This address explains things much better than I can:
http://www.gnu.
Justin Wells wrote:
> You can use webMacro on a corporate or commercial or any other kind
> of site. You can build applications based on WebMacro and transfer
> copyright to them to someone else. In both cases you can keep your
> sources proprietary, and do not need to contact anyone
Justin Wells wrote:
>
> Quoting Jason Hunter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > Justin,
> >
> > I don't want this to spark a long thread, but I would like some
> > clarification. Can I, without contacting anyone, use WebMacro as part
> > of a corporate
Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
> If you modify the original LGPL'd code
> however you have to distribute your changes.
source or binary?
Gabriel Wong
http://www.ezwebtools.com
-
___
To unsubscribe, send ema
Quoting Jason Hunter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Justin,
>
> I don't want this to spark a long thread, but I would like some
> clarification. Can I, without contacting anyone, use WebMacro as part
> of a corporate web site, keeping all the source to the site's content
:45:11
Please respond to "A mailing list for discussion about Sun Microsystem's
Java Servlet API Technology."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Glen Stampoultzis/ITD/MEL/Ansett/AU)
Subject: Re: webmacro
> it is hardly fair t
> it is hardly fair to say that
> WebMacro cannot be put to commercial use.
Justin,
I don't want this to spark a long thread, but I would like some
clarification. Can I, without contacting anyone, use WebMacro as part
of a corporate web site, keeping all the source to the sit
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
