The performacne cams from Mopar are non-roller cams. The 767 cam is not
specifically for turbo use and was meant as an upgrade for a non-turbo car.
Not to say that it won't work, but it may or may not be what you're looking for
in terms of power output and power curve (as in area under the cur
First off the GLHS came with a slider, non roller cam. The only roller
centerlined for this square tooth pulley is a 88 roller. You do not need the
sintered iron MP followers, in fact they eat the lobes faster, just buy
factory stock early slider followers. Don't buy the bent steel followers,
there
At 08:33 PM 9/19/2006 -0700, you wrote:
Next, the 767 cam is a GREAT TURBO CAM. I have run this in a 85 T1, 87 T1,
86 GLHS, and an 89 mini van. In every case it made more power. In a stock
setup or a computer that doesn't lean the engine under boost, the cam works
best. The reason is the cam flow
The roller followers tend to allow for more agressive cam profiles due to their
reduced valve train friction. They also tend to be quieter (the real reason
Chryco went to them along with the phenolic timing belt tensioner and round
tooth timing belt)
I think his point was that the more agressi
At 02:04 AM 9/21/2006 +, you wrote:
The roller followers tend to allow for more agressive cam profiles
due to their reduced valve train friction. They also tend to be
quieter (the real reason Chryco went to them along with the phenolic
timing belt tensioner and round tooth timing belt)
I
Its more situational. Some have found that when running a lot of boost that
high-overlap cams will allow boost to blow right out the exhaust.
Other have made good HP, but have had durability issues with some manfuacturers
of camshafts (the CompCams Super 60 unit in particular)
The rollers do
no longer be any trade off's between the cam types.
Rob Walsh
86 GLHS 76
89 CSX 187
84 DC Shelby Rampage
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:14:37 -0500
From: "William A. Yohman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: SD> Cam Questions.any help/input much appreciated.
At 08:33 PM 9/19/
