Have you changed the top clamp plate and the base plate . . . ever?
TFlan
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Reeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Scotland vs. Measuring Gauge
> Scott,
> I bought a used Scotland. I
Scott,
I bought a used Scotland. I should say a VERY used Scotland.
While it holds and bends clubs great, the loft measurements
aren't accurate. I use my old Maltby (crappy) machine to
hold the shaft and use a loft protractor to measure.
The Scotland's (mine at least) weren't accurate across all
In a message dated 3/30/2003 8:14:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
has anyone been to this site...I haven't been around
for about three years so pardon me if this is
repetitious.
Has anyone purchased from them? just curious...
http://www.golfmechanix.com
I see that the c
As far as the GS Gauge is concerned, the plane of the shaft (as it effects
loft) and the plane base is 90 deg. Given that, bounce should make no
difference in the loft reading. Whether you line up the clubface to dead
square on the GS Gauge definitely would make a difference though.
GregZ
-O
Loft on irons is measured from the centerline of the shaft, so if the face
of the iron is flat against the arms of the Scotland, you are getting the
loft. The base of the measuring gage is perpendicular to the arm holding the
shaft, you should get identical measurements!!
-Original Message
Could it be possible that the difference I'm seeing is due to the bounce? The GS
gauge measures loft in relation to the flat surface of the base of the gauge, vs. the
Scotland measures relative to preset angles that aren't affected by the bounce.
Scott
At 08:08 PM 3/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
has anyone been to this site...I haven't been around
for about three years so pardon me if this is
repetitious.
Has anyone purchased from them? just curious...
http://www.golfmechanix.com
--- tflan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahhh yes;
>
> This brings to mind the old adage; "a man with 2
> clo
Hi Scott,
I have the same two machines as you and have found the measurements on the
Scotland to be consistently 1 degree weaker than on the GS Club Gauge. The
lie is too close to call. Based on printed specs all bets are off when I got
into measuring a friends Volkey wedges. I got really weak mea
Ahhh yes;
This brings to mind the old adage; "a man with 2 clocks can never be certain
of the time."
TFlan
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Bershing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 1:43 PM
Subject: ShopTalk: Scotland vs. Measuring Gauge
> I've
In a message dated 3/30/03 4:44:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and the Scotland L&L machine I recently purchased (roughly 6 years old). The Scotland lofts are based on the older 'standard' of a 30° 5 iron, but doing the math is easy enough to measure the loft & lie.
A 3
I've been playing around with taking measurements using both the Golfsmith Golf Club
Gauge (model from a couple years ago) and the Scotland L&L machine I recently
purchased (roughly 6 years old). The Scotland lofts are based on the older 'standard'
of a 30° 5 iron, but doing the math is easy en
Some people here have been talking about
powder coating heads. I saw Harbor Freight has a powder coat oven for $69.99. I
don’t know anything about the process or this oven but it might be worth a
look. ITEM 47901-0VGA
Kevin
12 matches
Mail list logo
