Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| mess-mate wrote:
| > Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | mess-mate wrote:
| > | > I'm running version 3.2.6 on a debian system.
| > | >
| > | > And ETH0_IP=find_first_interface_address eth0
| > | > is not recognized.
| > | > What did i wrong ?
| >
mess-mate wrote:
> There is nothing more than a 'command not find' when starting
> shorewall.
> That's clear i think. That command couldn't be found.
> I've added 'functions' to /usr/local/bin, a general dir of my
> system, but nothing help.
> That command stays in 'functions' so what happen exac
mess-mate wrote:
> Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | mess-mate wrote:
> | > Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > | mess-mate wrote:
> | > | > I'm running version 3.2.6 on a debian system.
> | > | >
> | > | > And ETH0_IP=find_first_interface_address eth0
> | > | > is not recognized
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:07:39AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:04:42AM +, Simon Hobson wrote:
> > As for Debian, they have the popularity contest which I believe is
> > supposed to gather stats on what people are running.
>
> Yes. It looks at the atime stamps f
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 04:13:20PM +0100, Peter Wagner wrote:
>
> Thank you shorewall developers your scripts are runable in embedded
> linx devices saves me a lot of config time .
This doesn't surprise me, since it's basically just some scripts manipulating
the IPTables for you, w
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:27:47AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This doesn't surprise me, since it's basically just some scripts
> manipulating the IPTables for you, which is what makes it so good.
> This reminds me, however, is there anyone that provides "shrink-wrap"
> solutions with Shor
Shortly after I release Shorewall 3.4.2, I will be issuing the first release
of the new development thread which I'm calling Shorewall4.
I'm announcing the new product ahead of time so that people will have a
chance to comment on the approach (and the product name) in advance of the
initial releas
Hi, Guys!
Good Day!
I got the ppptd server running on my shorewall firewall (2 Interface) it can
connect but I cannot connect to anything else on my network so I don't know
what I'm doing wrong but I believed I have set the routing requirements for my
firewall. Here's the specs of my firewall:
Owel Paule wrote:
> Hi, Guys!
>
> Good Day!
>
> I got the ppptd server running on my shorewall firewall (2 Interface)
> it can connect but I cannot connect to anything else on my network so I
> don't know what I'm doing wrong but I believed I have set the routing
> requirements for my firewall.
--- Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm announcing the new product ahead of time so that
> people will have a
> chance to comment on the approach (and the product
> name) in advance of the
> initial release.
Just a thought but considering the shorewall-lite
package title format one may a
Vieri Di Paola wrote:
> --- Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm announcing the new product ahead of time so that
>> people will have a
>> chance to comment on the approach (and the product
>> name) in advance of the
>> initial release.
>
> Just a thought but considering the shorewall-l
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Sáb 24 Mar 2007, Vieri Di Paola disse:
> Just a thought but considering the shorewall-lite
> package title format one may also call it shorewall-ng
> or shorewall-pl.
> I prefer package names without numbers but that's just
> my opinion.
I agree.
The current stabl
Henrique Cesar Ulbrich wrote:
> Historiadores acreditam que,
> em Sáb 24 Mar 2007, Vieri Di Paola disse:
>> Just a thought but considering the shorewall-lite
>> package title format one may also call it shorewall-ng
>> or shorewall-pl.
>> I prefer package names without numbers but that's just
>> m
Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| mess-mate wrote:
|
| >
| > At now everything is logged in /var/log/messages.
|
| Are you complaining that Shorewall messages are logged in one of your
| Shorewall logs *and* in /var/log/messages or are you complaining that they
| are logged in /var/log/mes
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:37:39AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Products that end in '-ng' typically replace the product with the same
> name but without the '-ng'. That isn't going to happen here. So I prefer
> 'shorewall-pl'.
Language-specific names are usually a bad idea in the long
run. There's
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> Perhaps 'shorewall-compiler' or something like that? That's the
> essential difference of this code, as far as I can see.
>
I disagree. Shorewall has included a compiler since Shorewall 3.2 so the
fact that this product includes a compiler does not distinguish it from
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:50:54AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> The good news:
>
> a) The compiler has a small disk footprint (although Perl is large).
> b) The compiler is very fast.
> c) The compiler generates a firewall script that uses iptables-restore;
> so the script is very fast.
Now that's
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:58:54PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> Perhaps 'shorewall-compiler' or something like that? That's the
> essential difference of this code, as far as I can see.
>
I don't like it. How about northwall, ridgewall, seawall or richwall?
:-)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Rob
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:50:54AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
> - The code should be hugely simpler to understand (any non-trivial
> program written in shell spends half the code working around the
> limitations of shell), which makes it much more practical for random
19 matches
Mail list logo
