> However, if you want to use L7-filter, just use the NFQUEUE target in
> Shorewall-perl 4.0.6 to send the traffic you want to be filtered by
> L7-flter to NFQUEUE.
So are you advising me to use ipp2p?
Some people told me that L7-Filter is better than ipp2p, and I like it
because it can recognise
Wilson Kwok wrote:
> Tom,
>
> 1. I asked the vendor that they had setup this video conference software in
> others company was no problem with NATed.
>
> 2. Becuase the video conference software can use web-interface for
> client login , so server side required Windows IIS for it, the default
>
shacky wrote:
> Could you help me to understand how to use L7-Filter with the NFQUEUE
> features of Shorewall, please?
Sorry -- I looked at the L7-Filter documentation enough to understand that
it uses NFQUEUE and that's all that I have the time or the interest to do.
The basic idea should be tha
Hi all,
after a half day searching for an error, sniffing and upgrading to the
newest shorewall version I give up and the problem to you. I have
following configuration in my /etc/shorewall/masq:
#INTERFACE SOURCEADDRESS
vlan7::10.231.0.0/16 192.168.222.0/24
Christian Vieser wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after a half day searching for an error, sniffing and upgrading to the
> newest shorewall version I give up and the problem to you. I have
> following configuration in my /etc/shorewall/masq:
>
> #INTERFACE SOURCEADDRESS
> v
Hi all,
I'm a newbie to shorewall. I'm trying to set up a redirection for Tomcat
from port 80 to 8180 on my debian box. I've seen lots of examples for using
nat to other computers within a network but nothing for redirecting within
the same machine. This box is setup to just have a basic single-N
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:27:15PM -0800, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a newbie to shorewall. I'm trying to set up a redirection for Tomcat
> from port 80 to 8180 on my debian box. I've seen lots of examples for using
> nat to other computers within a network but nothing for r
Roberto C. Sánchez connexer.com> writes:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:31:15PM +0100, Stéphane Gully wrote:
> > > > You just need this rule:
> > > >
> > > > REDIRECT net 40240 tcp 80 - 87.145.23.55
Thanks Roberto for pointing this thread out. I just have one question,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:38:07AM +, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez connexer.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:31:15PM +0100, Stéphane Gully wrote:
> > > > > You just need this rule:
> > > > >
> > > > > REDIRECT net 40240 tcp 80 -
> No. You would need the address for the ORIGINAL DEST column.
> In your case, I would recommend my approach. Run apache on
> port 80 and the have it use ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse to
> http://127.0.0.1:4/ (or whatever you high-numbered port
> is). Then there is no need to involve S
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote:
>
> I actually just tried using
>
> REDIRECT net 40240 tcp 80 - -
>
> And it appears to have worked. I will continue to further test this but if I
> can avoid running apache (no particular reason ot
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:00:29PM -0800, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote:
>> I actually just tried using
>>
>> REDIRECT net 40240 tcp 80 - -
>>
>> And it appears to have worked. I will continue to further test this but if I
>> can avoid running ap
> I've not tried that personally. Perhaps Tom or someone else
> can comment on whether that is a good idea in the first place.
>
> Now, this may seem like a dumb question. If you are not
> running Apache, then why not just have Tomcat on port 80?
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
>
> --
> Roberto C
Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote:
> I have spent hours searching for ways and
> everyone seems to think redirection is the only option. If you know of a way
> to get Debian to allow Tomcat to bind at port 80 I would love to know.
The behavior you describe is mandated by IEEE 1003.1 (the POSIX
standa
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:08:09PM -0800, Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote:
>
> Definitely not a dumb question. I would love to run Tomcat on port 80 but I
> discovered that (under debian at least) I am unable to run Tomcat as a
> non-root user on any port under 1024 (linux security). I am also not v
Jean-Philippe Steinmetz wrote:
> Definitely not a dumb question. I would love to run Tomcat on port 80 but I
> discovered that (under debian at least) I am unable to run Tomcat as a
> non-root user on any port under 1024 (linux security). I am also not very
> keen on running Tomcat as root. I have
16 matches
Mail list logo
