Re: [Shorewall-users] VOIP stops working after Ubuntu 13.10 --> 14.04 upgrade

2014-10-04 Thread Simon Hobson
Alan McKay wrote: > FYI for anyone following along - the only thing left to do was turn > off the "NAT" setting within the GUI Portol of my VOIP provider > (voip.ms) Did you try blacklisting the SIP helper modules ? I think you had a case of "double conversion" (to work around the NAT) and you'

Re: [Shorewall-users] VOIP stops working after Ubuntu 13.10 --> 14.04 upgrade

2014-10-04 Thread Alan McKay
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Simon Hobson wrote: > Did you try blacklisting the SIP helper modules ? No I never did get to that point - sorry. > I think you had a case of "double conversion" (to work around the NAT) and > you've turned one of them off - That sounds quite likely. Anyway, it

[Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread PGNd
When installing tarball builds on a remote, the installer seems perfectly happy to install ONLY the shorewall-core shorewall-lite shorewall6-lite shorewall-init products. Nothing in the installer output that I've noticed, nor any output of cursory checks of shorewall-lite vers

Re: [Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:34:41PM -0700, PGNd wrote: > > What's actually the design-intended dependency set by upstream SW? > > Does any part of a remote-only install -- products = shorewall-core > shorewall-lite shorewall6-lite shorewall-init -- require the install of the > full products as w

[Shorewall-users] install of tarball's shorewall-lite FAILs if shorewall(-lite) prerequisite is not 1st installed

2014-10-04 Thread PGNd
cd /usr/local/src/shorewall-TARBALLS/ rm -rf /usr/local/shorewall-custom cd ./shorewall-core-4.6.4-Beta2-34-ge36b34c/ ./install.sh shorewallrc.suse cd ../shorewall-init-4.6.4-Beta2-34-ge36b34c/ sh -x ./install.sh shorewallrc.suse + echo 'Installing Shorewall Init Version 4.6.4-Beta2-34-ge3

Re: [Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread PGNd
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 04:46 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > I've packaged the Debian versions of shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite > to only depend on iptables, iproute, and bc. You should not even need > shorewall-core. That's a different prereq setup, then, than my current sample set of both

Re: [Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread Tom Eastep
On 10/4/2014 5:15 PM, PGNd wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 04:46 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> I've packaged the Debian versions of shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite >> to only depend on iptables, iproute, and bc. You should not even need >> shorewall-core. > > That's a different prereq setu

Re: [Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread PGNd
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 05:34 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: > What possible reason would there have been to develop the -lite products > if they depended on the full products on the same system? The -lite > products depend on Shorewall Core only. I don't know what was designed or why; hence, I ask. Hav

Re: [Shorewall-users] install of tarball's shorewall-lite FAILs if shorewall(-lite) prerequisite is not 1st installed

2014-10-04 Thread Tom Eastep
On 10/4/2014 5:01 PM, PGNd wrote: > cd /usr/local/src/shorewall-TARBALLS/ > rm -rf /usr/local/shorewall-custom > cd ./shorewall-core-4.6.4-Beta2-34-ge36b34c/ > ./install.sh shorewallrc.suse > cd ../shorewall-init-4.6.4-Beta2-34-ge36b34c/ > sh -x ./install.sh shorewallrc.suse > + echo 'Instal

Re: [Shorewall-users] install of tarball's shorewall-lite FAILs if shorewall(-lite) prerequisite is not 1st installed

2014-10-04 Thread PGNd
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 07:11 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: > Please remember that the installers were never designed to install a > runnable sandbox. This is just another case where the installer is > assuming that the directory exists if DESTDIR isn't set -- it now > creates the directory. I do remember

Re: [Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:34:00PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > > What possible reason would there have been to develop the -lite products > if they depended on the full products on the same system? The -lite > products depend on Shorewall Core only. > Lorenzo originally packaged the -lite products

Re: [Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread Tom Eastep
On 10/4/2014 7:40 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:34:00PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: >> >> What possible reason would there have been to develop the -lite products >> if they depended on the full products on the same system? The -lite >> products depend on Shorewall Core on

Re: [Shorewall-users] install of tarball's shorewall-lite FAILs if shorewall(-lite) prerequisite is not 1st installed

2014-10-04 Thread Tom Eastep
On 10/4/2014 7:23 PM, PGNd wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 07:11 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: >> Please remember that the installers were never designed to install a >> runnable sandbox. This is just another case where the installer is >> assuming that the directory exists if DESTDIR isn't set -- it now

Re: [Shorewall-users] checking dependency of -lite products on 'full' products

2014-10-04 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 08:03:38PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > > Yes -- all of the packages depend directly or indirectly on > Shorewall-core. Shorewall-init has no direct dependency, but to do > anything useful, it requires on one of the four packages that produce a > firewall (Shorewall, Shorewal