On 9/8/20 10:14 PM, pgndev wrote:
> I'm setting up a new SW instance, on a Fedora32 server.
>
>
> shorewall-lite version
>
> 5.2.7
>
>
> I compile locally, and push to remotes, as per my usual.
>
>
> I've configured 2 providers,
>
>
> cat providers
>
>
> myisp 1 0x100 - EXT_IF detect tra
On 9/9/20 10:07 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Have you set USE_RT_NAMES=Yes? That setting will cause provider names to
> appear in 'ip' commands rather that provider numbers. With
> USE_RT_NAMES=Yes, you must edit /etc/iproute2/rt_tables to provide the
> proper name->number mappings.
yep,
USE_RT
On 9/9/20 12:25 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 9/9/20 10:07 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>> Have you set USE_RT_NAMES=Yes? That setting will cause provider names to
>
>> appear in 'ip' commands rather that provider numbers. With
>
>> USE_RT_NAMES=Yes, you must edit /etc/iproute2/rt_tables to provide the
>
On 9/9/20 12:25 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 9/9/20 10:07 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>> Have you set USE_RT_NAMES=Yes? That setting will cause provider names to
>
>> appear in 'ip' commands rather that provider numbers. With
>
>> USE_RT_NAMES=Yes, you must edit /etc/iproute2/rt_tables to provide the
>
Shorewall 5.2.8 Beta 2 is now available for testing. I apologize for the
rabid-fire releases, but the new 'noanycast' option was generating
syntactically-incorrect code :-(
That has been corrected, and the discussion of 'noanycast' has been
expanded in the release notes and in shorewall-interfaces
On 9/9/20 12:56 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Ignore my last post -- /etc/iproute2/rt_tables IS automatically updated,
> unless KEEP_RT_TABLES=Yes.
ah, that'd provide an explanation
I'd 'imported'
USE_RT_NAMES=Yes
from prior configs, and (likely) had never touched
/etc/iproute2/rt_t