On Saturday 01 May 2010, Vasco Nevoa wrote:
> Petr Vanek wrote:
> > VN> discussion to prove an ongoing point. I'd prefer to see serious
> > VN> bugs like the SDcard freeze problem being solved before anyone goes
> >
> > Vasco, sorry for asking, which bug is that?
> >
> > thank you
> >
> > Petr
>
>
On 2010-04-30, Vasco Nevoa wrote:
> I'd prefer to see serious bugs like the SDcard freeze problem being
> solved before anyone goes on refactoring python daemons into vala daemons.
You forget that we are different people with different skills and
interest. Not all of us are kernel hackers that ca
Petr Vanek wrote:
VN> discussion to prove an ongoing point. I'd prefer to see serious
VN> bugs like the SDcard freeze problem being solved before anyone goes
Vasco, sorry for asking, which bug is that?
thank you
Petr
The Glamo interference problem with some sdcards. It freezes kernel
files
VN> discussion to prove an ongoing point. I'd prefer to see serious
VN> bugs like the SDcard freeze problem being solved before anyone goes
Vasco, sorry for asking, which bug is that?
thank you
Petr
___
Shr-User mailing list
Shr-User@lists.shr-project
Thank you for the enlightenment, Sebastian.
But when I speak of critical bugs I'm obviously not talking about this
little regression. I just picked up on another small discussion to prove
an ongoing point.
I'd prefer to see serious bugs like the SDcard freeze problem being
solved before anyone
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 14:52, Vasco Nevoa wrote:
> Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
>>
>> Please try to avoid judging without knowing anything about what you're
>> talking. With odeviced IT WORKED as you wanted - settings was stored
>> and they were easly changable by SHR Settings UI. It changed whe
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
Please try to avoid judging without knowing anything about what you're
talking. With odeviced IT WORKED as you wanted - settings was stored
and they were easly changable by SHR Settings UI. It changed when
migrating from odeviced to fsodeviced, which is regression in
2010/4/30 Vasco Névoa :
> Any setting that is changeable via GUI and doesn't get stored is VERY
> annoying.
> The reason I haven't spoken against this specific item (dim/sleep timings)
> is because I think there is always bigger fish to fry, more critical bugs to
> solve first, and I (wrongly) assu
Annoying! (yep, me too) :)
Russell Dwiggins
|-Original Message-
|From: shr-user-boun...@lists.shr-project.org [mailto:shr-user-
|boun...@lists.shr-project.org] On Behalf Of Tim Abell
|Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:48 PM
|To: Robin O'Leary
|Cc: shr-user@lists.shr-project.org
|Subject
bject: Re: [Shr-User] dim values
|
|it's true, i really do hate the default dim settings, and the fact it's
|such a pain to change & keep changed.
|:-)
|
|
|Robin O'Leary wrote:
|> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:16:56PM +0200, Joachim Ott wrote:
|>
|>> On 29 April 2010 18:
it's true, i really do hate the default dim settings, and the fact it's
such a pain to change & keep changed.
:-)
Robin O'Leary wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:16:56PM +0200, Joachim Ott wrote:
On 29 April 2010 18:18, Ben Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:30:23PM +0200, J
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:16:56PM +0200, Joachim Ott wrote:
> On 29 April 2010 18:18, Ben Thompson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:30:23PM +0200, Joachim Ott wrote:
> >> On 29 April 2010 10:28, Ben Thompson wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 03:35:55AM +0200, Kai-Martin wrote:
> >> >> p
12 matches
Mail list logo
