Re: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question

2015-11-26 Thread Geoff Huston
Declan, I’d pay more attention to this statement you are quoting if and only if the justification for this statement made any sense. As far as I can tell the example used to build to this point is confused and imprecise, so its a leap of faith that I’m not perform to then hold the conclusions as v

Re: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question

2015-11-26 Thread Declan Ma
Tim, Thanks for your explanations. Yet since the very draft keeps talking about Resource Transfer and deems it as one of the “Operational Considerations” in Section 3, we might pay attention to Steve’s statement as below: So, when folks claim that this alg allows for transfers to not have t

Re: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question

2015-11-26 Thread Tim Bruijnzeels
Hi, > On 25 Nov 2015, at 21:19, Stephen Kent wrote: > > None of those who believe that this draft is a good thing seem to have > addressed > an issue I raised a while ago; the proposed solution is ill-defined and, the > most > likely interpretation doesn't seem to work, in general. I'll try to