Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-12-21 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Yes, I’m good. Thanks!! Alvaro. On 12/21/16, 1:13 PM, "Rob Austein" > wrote: I hope this addresses the issue. ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-12-21 Thread Rob Austein
At Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:20:54 +, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: ... > it still doesn?t tell me what the child should do. I don?t think > you want to specify taking up one or the other, but at least include > some text that says that the child can choose. > > In thinking about this I came up

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-12-21 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Rob: Hi! You added some text about offer and referral: A parent is unlikely to need to send both and elements, but strictly speaking they are not mutually exclusive, so a parent which really needs to express that it both offers repository service to its child and is also willing to

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-12-20 Thread Rob Austein
Proposed -05, reflecting comments from AD review: https://subvert-ietf.hactrn.net/rpki-oob-setup/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-05.txt https://subvert-ietf.hactrn.net/rpki-oob-setup/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-05-from-04.diff.html Absent objections, I will post to I-D repository,

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-12-20 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
On 12/20/16, 12:33 PM, "Rob Austein" wrote: | At Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:24:27 +, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: | | C1. Why isn?t an IETF namespace [RFC3688] used in the XML schema? I | | would strongly suggest that you use one and request it in the IANA | |

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-12-20 Thread Rob Austein
At Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:24:27 +, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: > > C1. Why isn?t an IETF namespace [RFC3688] used in the XML schema? I > would strongly suggest that you use one and request it in the IANA > Considerations Section. Unlike the publication protocol, this > document specifies

[sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04

2016-12-20 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Rob: Hi! How are you? I just finished reading this document. Thanks for the work! I have some comments (below) that should be easy to address. I think the major one is about the ordering of the XML attributes (C2); I’ll start the IETF Last Call once (at least) that point is resolved.