Oopsy, Sandy asked that someone (and pointed at me) call some sort of
consensus on this doc and move it along (or punt it to the authors for
more work).
It seems there were a few folks willing to read the doc (and comment),
some further work was done and we have a version 8 now:
Support.
On Jul 13, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
The chairs have received a request from the authors for a WG Last Call for
The RPKI Ghostbusters Record, draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-06.
The document and the draft version history are available at:
At Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:35:11 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Sandy Murphy wrote:
The chairs have received a request from the authors for a WG Last Call for
The RPKI Ghostbusters Record, draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-06.
I've read this draft and support it going forward.
FWIW, I've also
I've read this document and support moving it forward.
Make sure to ask Stewart to send an email to the mailing list
ietf-ty...@ietf.org asking for comments on the Media Type section of
your specification.
spt
On 7/13/11 7:35 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
The chairs have received a request
I have read the document and think it would be a useful standard. In specific,
wearing my very dusty vCard-supporter hat, the constrained profile for vCard
seems quite appropriate.
--Paul Hoffman
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
Have read -06 and I think (generally) it is fine to progress with a tiny
personal nit.
I did wonder as I was reading the document if the object is optional or
mandatory in the repository structure? For example if I create a ROA, MUST I
create a Ghostbusters record. I can certainly see that for
