Re: [SIESTA-L] pseudo database; Zn configuration

2008-03-14 Thread Eduardo Anglada
Dear Andrei, On 13/03/2008, at 20:36, Andrei Postnikov wrote: Many thanks for Eduardo Anglada for uploading the ABINIT pseudos! Just two related questions: 1. Does somebody know whether there s a way to see from the .psf file if the core correction is included, and with which radius? Jus

[SIESTA-L] mulliken Qtot

2008-03-14 Thread Pablo Denis
Dear Siesta users, I have a question about mulliken Qtot. I made this question about one year go but I still don´t find a reasonable explanation. If I attach a fluorine atom to a SWCNT I got Qtot up 123.5 and Qtot down 123.5. Why I have half beta spin? I would e

Re: [SIESTA-L] mulliken Qtot

2008-03-14 Thread lan haiping
you should have used smearing function for accelerating scf calculation On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Pablo Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Siesta users, > > I have a question about mulliken Qtot. I made > this question about one year go but I still don´t f

Re: [SIESTA-L] pseudo database;

2008-03-14 Thread Andrei Postnikov
On 13/03/2008, at 20:36, Andrei Postnikov wrote: | > 1. Does somebody know whether there s a way to see from the .psf file if the | > core correction is included, and with which radius? | On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Eduardo Anglada wrote: | Just now there is no way, but I have all the info, of course

Re: [SIESTA-L] mulliken Qtot

2008-03-14 Thread Andrei Postnikov
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Pablo Denis wrote: | Dear Siesta users, | I have a question about mulliken Qtot. I made | this question about one year go but I still don´t find a reasonable | explanation. | | If I attach a fluorine atom to a SWCNT I got Qtot up 123.5 and Qtot down | 123.5. Why I have half

Re: [SIESTA-L] pseudo database;

2008-03-14 Thread Eduardo Anglada
On 14/03/2008, at 19:22, Andrei Postnikov wrote: On 13/03/2008, at 20:36, Andrei Postnikov wrote: | > 1. Does somebody know whether there s a way to see from the .psf file if the | > core correction is included, and with which radius? | On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Eduardo Anglada wrote: | Just now

Re: [SIESTA-L] ANNOUNCE: LDA & GGA pseudo databases

2008-03-14 Thread reza behnam
Dear Eduardo, Thank you for this great work for the siesta community. It seems that it is for the non-core-correction(nc) and non-relativistic (nrl). Can we use it for the spin-polarized situation also? Best Regards, Reza - Original Message From: Eduardo Anglada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T

[SIESTA-L] difference between spin- and nonspoin- polarized .psf ?

2008-03-14 Thread reza behnam
Dear all, I am testing a ppt for hcp-co by energy minimization with lattice constant and a fixed c/a. with non-polarization option in fdf file it converge very well and I am getting a reasonable lattice constant but when I set the SpinPolarized T , it dose not converge! dose it mean that th

Re: [SIESTA-L] ANNOUNCE: LDA & GGA pseudo databases

2008-03-14 Thread chu-chun fu
Hola Eduardo, Gracias! Una cosa, me fije de nuevo tu tabla en el web site de Siesta, muy rapidamente los pseudos de GGA, me di cuenta que los 4d estan bien pero los 3d de transition metals siguen vacios! a lo mejor todavia un pequenio bug ? Sino, te agradeceria que me des los valores de part