Re: [SIESTA-L] Overestimation of optimized lattice constant for SmTe

2008-05-09 Thread Eduardo Anglada
On 03/05/2008, at 12:39, Nidhi Sharma wrote: Hi to all, I am trying to compute the energy for different lattice constant to get the E vs V graph (in B1 phase of Smte using LDA). For this I have selected the range from 5.5 to 7.5 Ang in steps of 0.05. After Murnaghan fit optimize

Re: [SIESTA-L] Overestimation of optimized lattice constant for SmTe

2008-05-09 Thread Oleksandr Voznyy
I would say that for LDA overestimation of lattice constant is not OK. (Although I cannot guarantee that this is the case for SmTe) Normally, LDA lattice constant should be 1% smaller than expt, while in GGA up to 2% overestimation is OK. Otherwise, try other set of parameters.

Re: [SIESTA-L] Overestimation of optimized lattice constant for SmTe

2008-05-03 Thread N H
It does not matter with step you use to plot this ExV surface, the result must be the same if you are using the same basis set and so on ... by the way, 4% isent so bad result for a first guess basis, and your Bulk modulus is absolutelly ok ... another think is, try to compare your results with