[SIESTA-L] transiesta

2006-07-13 Thread M.Sairam Swaroop
hi all I wanted to know how can i get the transiesta routine which the developers want to integrate with the next version of siesta. Is there a way that this package can be given independent of the siesta package. thanks -- M.Sairam Swaroop Theoretical Sciences Unit JNCASR,Jakkur Bangalore-64 IN

[SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-25 Thread francisco tiano
Hello, I need a favor, someone knows where I can obtain the TranSiesta?, I already have the license of the Siesta but I need to calculate properties of transport and i can't find the program in any part.

[SIESTA-L] Transiesta

2007-07-02 Thread Hyungjun Kim
Hi, Siesta Users! When I read a paper, many people use a TranSiesta. Can I know what this is? It seems that a Siesta package for transport property calculation. Is it a free package? Is it related to the Atomistix? Thanks in advance. Hyungjun

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-25 Thread Emilio Artacho
Hi Francisco The 3.0 version (should come up very shortly) has it included in the package. Emilio francisco tiano wrote: Hello, I need a favor, someone knows where I can obtain the TranSiesta?, I already have the license of the Siesta but I need to calculate properties of transport and i can'

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-25 Thread francisco tiano
Thank you for the response, excuse me, how soon? Because I need it for my pre-grade thesis, and if already I have the license of 2.0 I need to ask for the license again to obtain 3.0? 2009/6/26 Emilio Artacho > Hi Francisco > > The 3.0 version (should come up very shortly) has it included > in t

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-25 Thread Emilio Artacho
francisco tiano wrote: Thank you for the response, excuse me, how soon? as I understand it should be a matter of days, but the precise date depends on details I don't know. Because I need it for my pre-grade thesis, and if already I have the license of 2.0 I need to ask for the license again

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-28 Thread Reza Kalantari
Dear Emilio Hi, Dose TranSiesta have any limitation? For example number of atoms or type of possible atom? I am working on a nanobiosensor and its mechanism which is based on electrical conductance transaction mechanism such as a field effect transistor. Is it possible let me know that I can u

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread Mehmet Topsakal
Instead of waiting for 3.0, I think you should try ATK (http://www.quantumwise.com/). It has a gui and it is very easy to learn. I took me only 3 days to compile/learn/run it. Also you can gain lots of usefull knowledge about transport calculations from the atk manual. On 06/28/2009 02:02 PM,

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread Emilio Artacho
On Jun 28 2009, Reza Kalantari wrote: Hi, Dose TranSiesta have any limitation? For example number of atoms or type of possible atom? I am working on a nanobiosensor and its mechanism which is based on electrical conductance transaction mechanism such as a field effect transistor. Is it possibl

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread Jose A.
Dear Mehmet: To be fair, you forgot to mention that to enjoy the gui, you have to be ready to pay periodically for the atk license (quite a non negligible amount). But this is really not the place to advertise any code! So please let us not do so in the future Yours, Jose A. Torres -- Jose A.

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread Markus Kaukonen
Dear All, I disagree with Dr. Torres: in case Siesta is not having some method built in it is useful for users to know in which codes the desired option is present. Open competition between codes should benefit users. terveisin, Markus --www=http://www.iki.fi/markus.kaukonen --markus.kauko...@

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread lan haiping
I donot think it is wise to advertise a stupid black box . On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Markus Kaukonen wrote: > Dear All, > > I disagree with Dr. Torres: > in case Siesta is not having some method built in it is useful for > users to know in which codes the desired option is present. > > Ope

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread N H
I dont think is wise using expressions like "stupid blackbox" in any scientific forum. On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, lan haiping wrote: > I donot think it is wise to advertise a stupid black box . > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Markus Kaukonen > wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> I disagree

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread Jose A.
Dear All I guess you all know that SIESTA has been always for the benefit of users, and for open and fair information. Since, quite on the contrary, advertising stands for the benefit of the advertiser and for biased and not fair information, we think that we should not make this forum a p

Re: [SIESTA-L] TranSiesta

2009-06-29 Thread Mehmet Topsakal
I'm not a SALESMAN. I don't have any atk license or any relationship with it. I just wanted to help someone on this forum related with transport calculations. I never intended to suggest users of this forum to use ATK instead of SIESTA. Even, I'm really looking forward to Siesta 3.0. I'm NOT "t

Re: [SIESTA-L] Transiesta

2007-07-02 Thread Emilio Artacho
TransiestaC is related to Atomistix TranSiesta is not. TranSiesta is related to Siesta. Emilio Hyungjun Kim wrote: Hi, Siesta Users! When I read a paper, many people use a TranSiesta. Can I know what this is? It seems that a Siesta package for transport property calculation. Is it a free packa