On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 09:37:52PM -0500, Jeff Strunk wrote:
> The reasoning behind the current behavior is that MUAs have reply-to-all as a
> standard feature. In mozilla mail, evolution, and kmail there is a button for
> reply-to-all. In mutt the default key is g to reply-to-all. Pine seems to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The thing is, reply-to-all isn't what we want. If I send an email to the
_list_, it doesn't also need to go to the sender of the original message
because then you get two copies.
And how often do you send a reply to a message from this list that needs
t
I know I fully agree with the second paragraph.
If your like me, (if you know me you might laugh at this) that some times a
reply can be totally off topic. I know I've been very pleased that I've only
looked like a total fool to one person and not the entire mailing list.
Big Mike
On Sun, Sep
The reasoning behind the current behavior is that MUAs have reply-to-all as a
standard feature. In mozilla mail, evolution, and kmail there is a button for
reply-to-all. In mutt the default key is g to reply-to-all. Pine seems to be
the only one I just now checked that is missing this feature.
I vote in favor of the reply-to being [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-matt
___
Siglinux mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux
