I know I fully agree with the second paragraph. If your like me, (if you know me you might laugh at this) that some times a reply can be totally off topic. I know I've been very pleased that I've only looked like a total fool to one person and not the entire mailing list.
Big Mike On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 09:37:52PM -0500, Jeff Strunk wrote: > The reasoning behind the current behavior is that MUAs have reply-to-all as a > standard feature. In mozilla mail, evolution, and kmail there is a button for > reply-to-all. In mutt the default key is g to reply-to-all. Pine seems to be > the only one I just now checked that is missing this feature. > > The other reason is that a message intended to be private that becomes public > is harder to fix than a messge intended to be public that was just sent to > one person. You can resend the latter, but you can really retract the first. > > -Jeff > > On Sunday 05 September 2004 07:26 pm, Matt Bradbury wrote: > > I vote in favor of the reply-to being [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -matt > > _______________________________________________ > > Siglinux mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux > _______________________________________________ > Siglinux mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux -- Auto generated sentence : Alfred E. Neumann walked to Uranus and defeats the capsule. _______________________________________________ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux
