-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
The thing is, reply-to-all isn't what we want. If I send an email to the _list_, it doesn't also need to go to the sender of the original message because then you get two copies.
And how often do you send a reply to a message from this list that needs to be secret? It seems silly to optimize for the uncommon case.
- - Jeff #2
Jeff Strunk wrote:
| The reasoning behind the current behavior is that MUAs have reply-to-all as a | standard feature. In mozilla mail, evolution, and kmail there is a button for | reply-to-all. In mutt the default key is g to reply-to-all. Pine seems to be | the only one I just now checked that is missing this feature. | | The other reason is that a message intended to be private that becomes public | is harder to fix than a messge intended to be public that was just sent to | one person. You can resend the latter, but you can really retract the first. | | -Jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBO/3LfjbRRQT0l5URAv9OAKDTR1tox0bAQJgDSMoH0ShjCgHsRACgxBJT 0AfalNzwnn1d5uXfTr4UCOo= =WTX/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux
