Attn: Web rebuilder/builder with time
Siglinux or recommended nonmember
I have a small job paying a few $s for web site work. Three sites are
being moved to new hosts. On one original text might be copied from
archive.org. On two others/nonprofits, the builder will be given a "map"
descr
Howdy,
The organizers meeting will be held this Friday at 5pm. Meet in the basement
lounge area of Taylor Hall. We will discuss website maintenance, mailing
list maintenance, events and flyering.
Thank you,
Jeff
___
Siglinux mailing list
[EMAIL
We need install CDs for the installfest on Saturday September 18th. Please
burn CDs for Mandrake, Fedora, and Debian and drop them off in the ACM
office( Taylor 1.118(the basement)) before Friday September 17th.
The installfest will be held at its usual time and usual place of Saturday
from 10:
It was my mistake. I have kmail set to send all replies from my siglinux
folder to the list. And I have procmail set to send all messages with
Siglinux in the Subject into my siglinux folder. So, it was a private
message that I accidentally made public.
Sorry,
Jeff
On Wednesday 08 September 2
I see that their is a post from Doc Shipley that didn't make it to the
list until Jeff replied back to the list.
Doc, was that meant for the list or for only Jeff? Did you make a
mistake on who you replied to?
How many people have their Reply-To: set to something different than
their From: a
After reading the Considered Harmful article, I no longer have a strong
opinion on the issue and could live with either configuration. I'll just
tailor my mail software to my list usage behaviors. I retract my vote
for munging and would rather abstain.
While munging is convenient for mailing lists
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 11:43 am, Doc Shipley wrote:
> Jeff Strunk wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Since only one person replied that they would go to an organizers meeting
> > I am posting the announcement to everyone. I also had a major change in
> > my daily schedule, so evenings are no longer
Howdy,
Since only one person replied that they would go to an organizers meeting I am
posting the announcement to everyone. I also had a major change in my daily
schedule, so evenings are no longer a regular option for me. I would like to
meet tomorrow or Friday between noon and 5pm.
So, if yo
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 10:50 am, Robert Giles wrote:
> From what I remember, Jeff reconfigured the list "Reply-to" behavior last
> time without taking a vote or providing reasons for doing so ahead of
> time...
>
From what the archive says in 6/2003 and 7/2003, there was a vote in the
for
At 10:09 9/8/04, you wrote:
Also the burden of proof is on your end, since you want to change the
status-quo on this list. To convince me you will have to provide more
reasons than "me and a handful of other guys want it this way so lets
enforce it on everyone".
From what I remember, Jeff reconfig
I have counter points to each of these, but I'll start with the low
hanging fruit as I run off to class.
I'll consider the RFC stuff this evening, but from what I got glancing
at it I saw nothing that strengthens your point. Yes the reply-to
header exists, but the correct way of using the header
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 09:03:41PM -0700, Scott James Cederberg wrote:
> I have to say, I'm pretty convinced by the "Considered Harmful" article.
> I vote to keep things the way they are.
same here.
-jason pepas
___
Siglinux mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
12 matches
Mail list logo
