2007/8/5, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 06 Aug 2007 2:06 am, Radhika, Y. wrote:
We Indians are highly goal focused rather
than process oreinted-I suspect that old fashioned contempt for dating also
has to do with intolerance for ambiguity and low risk tolerance ather than
mere
I agree that ensuring family wealth is a big factor in societies
keeping . And here I am speculating but I see the mergence of both a
narrowing and a broadening of the term family. Being outside the IT
world but having spent many an afternoon eavesdropping on IT
professionals on Brigade Road while
Udhay,
http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu/
I'd be especially interested
in comments from Vip and Rishab.
Do you mind if I chip in?
I think any automated device to measure reputation, reliabilty or
trust is dangerously stupid. It would be so anyhow. To make things
worse, the criteria in this case
On an egroup that I moderate, we have been having discussions about
the business ethics,Ior lack thereof, in large Indian companies. t
started with our rating of various Internet Service Providers and went
on to mobile phone companies. Several names were, of course mentioned,
but I am not bringing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Deepa Mohan wrote:
[interesting exercise I must admit]
Why things are so bad even in Big companies:
1) Popular feeling among both the elite and common man
that we can't change things as they are.
(imagine if Mahatma Gandhi had felt the same
--- ashok _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anymore. I have a couple of cousins who are slaving
like fools to save
money for their daughters marriage (their daughters
are less than 10
years old now...)... in some misplaced belief that
15 years hence, their
kids will actually listen to them.
Two
--- Gautam John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newsweek Disgrace: 'Global-Warming Deniers: A
Well-Funded Machine'
By Noel Sheppard | August 5, 2007 - 13:43 ET
I find it interesting that this article appears to be
more critical of the politics behind the position than
the actual science.
I do
I do agree that attributing scepticism to bad science
or bad intentions is deplorable. The interesting thing
to ask, IMHO, is: what does the majority scientific
community position on (a) is the climate changing? (b)
is it probable that the climate change is attributable
to human interference
On 8/5/07, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Similarly in America, it would be easy for people raised as Hindus to
raise children outside of traditional Hindu culture if they so
desired. Would such children be considered Hindu by Indians? What if
the parents changed their names and the
On Tuesday 07 Aug 2007 5:11 am, Charles Haynes wrote:
If that is not sufficiently clear, what about the hypothetical case of
a Hindu infant, adopted by secular non-believers and raised in a
non-Hindu culture. Is that child still Hindu? Ignore for the moment
how unlikely this is to actually
--- Venky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do agree that attributing scepticism to bad
science
or bad intentions is deplorable. The interesting
thing
to ask, IMHO, is: what does the majority
scientific
community position on (a) is the climate changing?
(b)
is it probable that the climate
On 8/6/07, Divya Sampath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Gautam John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newsweek Disgrace: 'Global-Warming Deniers: A
Well-Funded Machine'
By Noel Sheppard | August 5, 2007 - 13:43 ET
I find it interesting that this article appears to be
more critical of the politics
12 matches
Mail list logo
