Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-17 Thread Ode Coyote
sage- >> From: Marshall Dudley >> To: silver-list@eskimo.com >> Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:43 AM >> Subject: Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc. >> >> Marshall, you wrote: >> >> ... a piece of copper [wire] dropped into a batch of CS will

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-16 Thread Marshall Dudley
Phinneas wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Marshall Dudley > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:43 AM > Subject: Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc. > > Marshall, you wrote: > >> ... a piece of copper [wire] dropped into a batch

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-16 Thread Phinneas
-Original Message- From: Marshall Dudley To: silver-list@eskimo.com Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:43 AM Subject: Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc. Marshall, you wrote: >> ... a piece of copper [wire] dropped into a batch of CS will become coated with a frothy structure of silv

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-16 Thread Ode Coyote
>> >> So, using very pure water allows high particle counts with a small size. >> The contaminants don't have to be 'dissolved' contaminants [registering on a meter] to have an effect. >> In fact, a piece of copper [wire] dropped into a batch of CS will become coated with a frothy structure of sil

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-15 Thread Marshall Dudley
Ode Coyote wrote: > 'fraid it's not that simple Marshall > > The more particles you pack into a given area, the more "likely" they are to > collide and stick together. > Heat can induce too much motion into particles and force them together. [Over > around 110 deg F] That is what I said. > > >

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-13 Thread Ode Coyote
'fraid it's not that simple Marshall The more particles you pack into a given area, the more "likely" they are to collide and stick together. Heat can induce too much motion into particles and force them together. [Over around 110 deg F] The concentration of particles is not uniform in water u

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-12 Thread Matthew McCann PE
MessageHear, hear! Bravo. - Original Message - From: James Holmes To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 11:05 AM Subject: RE: CS>Microns, angstroms etc. A note to the CS student. This post by the Coyote is jam-packed with good practical informat

CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-12 Thread oldgl...@bigcountry.net
Hi Ode, I'm impressed! Thank you so much! Jean Baugh * > From: Ode Coyote > > 1 nanometer = 0.001 micron > 1 micron = 10, 000 angstroms > 1 angstrom = 0.1 nanometer > 1 angstrom = 0.0001 micron > > Blah blah blah. > Google has this cool fuction where you type in 'x' micron

CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-12 Thread oldgl...@bigcountry.net
Thank you Marshall! I can do this. Jean Baugh ** > You will likely find that the size of the particles is more dependent on the > quality of the water than the generator design. There are some differences as > to the size and spacing of the electrodes, and if the water is

RE: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-12 Thread James Holmes
future reference. There is more relevant info on CS here than in many lengthy technical writings by others. Take heed. JOH -Original Message- From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 5:53 AM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Micr

CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-12 Thread Matthew McCann PE
Hello, Marshall, Thank you very much for epitomizing the issues surrounding the generating Ag ions and particles in one trenchant summary. Bravo! Best regards, Matthew

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-12 Thread Marshall Dudley
You will likely find that the size of the particles is more dependent on the quality of the water than the generator design. There are some differences as to the size and spacing of the electrodes, and if the water is stirred or not. Basically the cooler the water, the lower the current, the purer

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-12 Thread Ode Coyote
1 nanometer = 0.001 micron 1 micron = 10, 000 angstroms 1 angstrom = 0.1 nanometer 1 angstrom = 0.0001 micron Blah blah blah. Google has this cool fuction where you type in 'x' microns to angstroms and it tells you what is what. Fact is, most generator makers [and CS sellers] don't know what siz

Re: CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-11 Thread William Meyer
the silverpuppy and the silvergen models produce mostly ionic silver. most dc (battery) systems produce mostly ionic silver. you cannot get any smaller than an ion of silver and still be silver as far as i am aware. i like the silverpuppy at 99 dollars. the smaller the particle the better. some

CS>Microns, angstroms etc.

2004-03-11 Thread oldgl...@bigcountry.net
Hi, Can anyone explain the difference between the size of the colloidal silver particles? One company will advertise one way and another company will advertise another way. Apparently the smaller the silver particles, the more beneficial? If this is the case, can anyone say with authority which