Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-26 Thread Pat
: CS>cs vs mms? Hi i have been studing on C.silver for some time an have had good results with it on humans and animals need more information on it. Do you know if they have taken the archives off the silver list - Original Message - >From: MarshallDudley >To: si

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-26 Thread Betty Freeman
: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 11:17 AM Subject: Re: CS>cs vs mms? CS is colloidal particles of silver mixed with ionic silver. It is effective on viruses, bacteria, yeasts and fungi. It is also effective on at least some protozoa, but not directly effective on parasites. It cannot penetr

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-24 Thread Dan Nave
Enzymes like Bromelain are effective against biofilms. Taking Bromelain with antibiotics makes them work much better. It is possible that enzymes like Bromelain would do the same thing when used in conjunction with colloidal silver. Dan On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Ode Coyote wrote: > >  

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-24 Thread Ode Coyote
taste... CS is not. more, but i have no time to go on and am not an expert. > -Original Message- > From: Beth [mailto:csilverl...@yahoo.ca] > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:32 AM > To: silver-list > Subject: CS>cs vs mms? > > Hi > Okay so I have been studyin

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-24 Thread Ode Coyote
it badly. Ode At 08:05 AM 11/23/2010 -0800, you wrote: One thing I have noticed is that no one has discussed CS for biofilms but I have read about using MMS for biofilms. PT From: Beth To: silver-list Sent: Tue, November 23, 2010 9:32:09 AM Subject: CS>cs vs mms? Hi Okay so I have bee

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-23 Thread Jonathan B. Britten
eded against stuff in the blood, and might be good to use in > "pulses" with CS used when the MMS is not. > MMS is vile to the taste... CS is not. > > more, but i have no time to go on and am not an expert. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Beth [mailto

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-23 Thread David AuBuchon
en the MMS is not. > MMS is vile to the taste... CS is not. > > more, but i have no time to go on and am not an expert. > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Beth [mailto:csilverl...@yahoo.ca] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:32 AM > > To: silver-list >

RE: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-23 Thread bob Larson
o time to go on and am not an expert. > -Original Message- > From: Beth [mailto:csilverl...@yahoo.ca] > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:32 AM > To: silver-list > Subject: CS>cs vs mms? > > Hi > Okay so I have been studying results from CS and MMS. > Can som

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-23 Thread Marshall Dudley
CS is colloidal particles of silver mixed with ionic silver. It is effective on viruses, bacteria, yeasts and fungi. It is also effective on at least some protozoa, but not directly effective on parasites. It cannot penetrate into the lymph system, and is believed by many to also be blocked b

Re: CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-23 Thread PT Ferrance
One thing I have noticed is that no one has discussed CS for biofilms but I have read about using MMS for biofilms. PT From: Beth To: silver-list Sent: Tue, November 23, 2010 9:32:09 AM Subject: CS>cs vs mms? Hi Okay so I have been studying results f

CS>cs vs mms?

2010-11-23 Thread Beth
Hi Okay so I have been studying results from CS and MMS. Can someone tell me what the difference is? Is there a different result if I use silver compared to using mms? Or do they both do the same thing? If you have an opinion whether scientific or not, I would like to hear it.   Beth