Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-13 Thread Ode Coyote
It might be added that killing 650 disease organisms does not mean 'cures 650 diseases'. The human body is much more complex than a petrie dish. Ken At 03:33 PM 6/12/02 -0400, you wrote: Dear Jack, You said: As an antibiotic, colloidal silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms,

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Jack Dayton
Hi Reid and Catherine, What do you find ambiguous about: As an antibiotic, colloidal silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms, and resistant strains fail to develop. or An antibiotic kills perhaps a half-dozen different disease organisms, but silver kills some 650. Jack From:

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Catherine Creel
Dear Jack, You said: As an antibiotic, colloidal silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms, and resistant strains fail to develop. What is ambiguous (uncertain) is the accuracy of the statement until the studies are found where CS was effective in rendering a total of 650

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Acmeair
just a few excerpts from a google search. - Original Message - From: Catherine Creel ccr...@maine.rr.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: Re: CSRe: 650 Dear Jack, You said: As an antibiotic, colloidal silver kills over 650

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Jack Dayton
Hi Catherine, I think you might have missed something at the beginning of the discussion about 650. I didn't SAY: As an antibiotic, colloidal silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms, and resistant strains fail to develop. that was a quote from the source I posted. I am the one who

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Noel White
UCLA tested pathogenic microbes in vitro(in glass) not invivo(Inthe body) and not 650. It would take herculeanen effort and many years and Much money to do double blind studies on humans with 650 pathogenic infections. Noel -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Marshall Dudley
I had read somewhere several years ago that the 650 is the number of pathogens that CS was reported to kill prior to 1938 by as reported in old medical journals. But I have been unable to find that since. Marshall Noel White wrote: UCLA tested pathogenic microbes in vitro(in glass) not

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Noel White
I doubt if they were doing clinical and double blind in vivo studies in 1938. Noel -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-12 Thread Marshall Dudley
Nope, at that time the doctors used what they found worked. If you want double blind studies to determine that something works, then aspirin does not work either for pain relief. The only double blind studies done on it I believe are for prevention of heart attacks. They didn't do double blind

CSRe: 650

2002-06-11 Thread Reid Harvey
Jack, We all know the FDA boys tell common folk that they'll get nasty argyria for sure if they take CS, but approach them and drug industry types as if you've got deep pockets, with money to invest. Then they'll tell you that CS is a 'broad spectrum anit-microbial. I'd imagine that the number

Re: CSRe: 650

2002-06-11 Thread Catherine Creel
Dear Reid, You said: I'd imagine that the number 650 does not come from any kind of exhaustive research on CS and each and every ailment, rather referring to how many ailments are caused by primitive microbes, of the variety so responsive to treatment by CS. That's my understanding, as